Comparable Predictive Performance of Non‐VCTE–Based Machine Learning Model for HBV‐Infected Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients remains challenging. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is useful for HCC prediction; however, its nationwide use might be limited in CHB-endemic or resource-limited regions. We developed and validated non-VCTE-based machine learning (ML) models for HCC prediction, integrating routine clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS: We analyzed a multicenter cohort of CHB patients receiving entecavir or tenofovir. ML-based survival models were developed and validated, with their performance compared both with and without VCTE-derived parameters (liver stiffness measurement/controlled attenuation parameter) to analyze VCTE's role amidst routine variables. Non-VCTE-based ML models were then compared against the modified PAGE-B (mPAGE-B) score. Model performance was assessed by Uno's C-index, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and Brier score at 5-, 6-, and 7-year follow-up using cross-validation and external validation. RESULTS: Among 2736 patients (training n = 1954; validation n = 782), no statistically significant difference in predictive performance was observed between ML-based models with and without VCTE-derived parameters. Non-VCTE-based ML models consistently demonstrated superior overall performance and a statistically significant difference compared to the mPAGE-B score. The non-VCTE-based RSF model demonstrated the highest discrimination (5-year C-index: 0.821; Brier score: 0.0592) in external validation. Statistically significant improvements over the mPAGE-B score were observed across all metrics except for rpCox's AUC up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: ML-based models provide superior long-term HCC risk prediction in CHB patients compared to the mPAGE-B score. Importantly, their performance remains robust even without VCTE-derived parameters, suggesting that effective risk stratification is achievable across diverse clinical settings, especially CHB-endemic or resource-limited regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70686
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparable Predictive Performance of Non‐VCTE–Based Machine Learning Model for HBV‐Infected Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk

Namkug Kim, Tae Seop Lim, Hahn Yi, Beom Kyung Kim et al.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparable Predictive Performance of Non‐VCTE–Based Machine Learning Model for HBV‐Infected Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk

Namkug Kim, Tae Seop Lim, Hahn Yi, Beom Kyung Kim, Hye Won Lee, Jae Il Shin, Hyung Woong Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients remains challenging. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is useful for HCC prediction; however, its nationwide use might be limited in CHB-endemic or resource-limited regions. We developed and validated non-VCTE-based machine learning (ML) models for HCC prediction, integrating routine clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS: We analyzed a multicenter cohort of CHB patients receiving entecavir or tenofovir. ML-based survival models were developed and validated, with their performance compared both with and without VCTE-derived parameters (liver stiffness measurement/controlled attenuation parameter) to analyze VCTE's role amidst routine variables. Non-VCTE-based ML models were then compared against the modified PAGE-B (mPAGE-B) score. Model performance was assessed by Uno's C-index, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and Brier score at 5-, 6-, and 7-year follow-up using cross-validation and external validation. RESULTS: Among 2736 patients (training n = 1954; validation n = 782), no statistically significant difference in predictive performance was observed between ML-based models with and without VCTE-derived parameters. Non-VCTE-based ML models consistently demonstrated superior overall performance and a statistically significant difference compared to the mPAGE-B score. The non-VCTE-based RSF model demonstrated the highest discrimination (5-year C-index: 0.821; Brier score: 0.0592) in external validation. Statistically significant improvements over the mPAGE-B score were observed across all metrics except for rpCox's AUC up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: ML-based models provide superior long-term HCC risk prediction in CHB patients compared to the mPAGE-B score. Importantly, their performance remains robust even without VCTE-derived parameters, suggesting that effective risk stratification is achievable across diverse clinical settings, especially CHB-endemic or resource-limited regions.

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Ulsan College (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Severance Hospital (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Yonsei University Health System (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.