Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications

ABSTRACT With the consumption of protein consumption increasing globally, there are gaps in our understanding of the differences in protein sources, particularly between animal and plant proteins and their recommendations for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). This narrative review synthesizes current evidence of how animal and plant proteins differentially exert physiological effects, influence IBD risk, and outcomes. First, protein sources vary in their amino acid profiles, co‐existence with other nutrients and consumption within a dietary pattern, factors that influence their physiological effects. Second, observational data showed possible associations between higher intake of animal protein and risk of Ulcerative Colitis (UC); however, this association is less consistent with Crohn's Disease (CD). High intake of meat, specifically red meat, is also associated with a greater risk for a UC relapse. Third, specific animal proteins are utilized as part of efficacious strategies for the induction and maintenance of CD. In conclusion, the available data suggest that recommendations for the IBD patient should move beyond animal versus plant protein advice but consider individual protein sources and the wider dietary pattern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JGH Open
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70462
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications

Ayushi Chauhan, Chu K Yao, Vaios Svolos, Abhinav Vasudevan et al.
JGH Open
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications

Ayushi Chauhan, Chu K Yao, Vaios Svolos, Abhinav Vasudevan, Mustafa Mohamedrashed
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the consumption of protein consumption increasing globally, there are gaps in our understanding of the differences in protein sources, particularly between animal and plant proteins and their recommendations for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). This narrative review synthesizes current evidence of how animal and plant proteins differentially exert physiological effects, influence IBD risk, and outcomes. First, protein sources vary in their amino acid profiles, co‐existence with other nutrients and consumption within a dietary pattern, factors that influence their physiological effects. Second, observational data showed possible associations between higher intake of animal protein and risk of Ulcerative Colitis (UC); however, this association is less consistent with Crohn's Disease (CD). High intake of meat, specifically red meat, is also associated with a greater risk for a UC relapse. Third, specific animal proteins are utilized as part of efficacious strategies for the induction and maintenance of CD. In conclusion, the available data suggest that recommendations for the IBD patient should move beyond animal versus plant protein advice but consider individual protein sources and the wider dietary pattern.

JGH OpenVol. 10(9)
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Glasgow (GB)
American Indian Graduate Center, Monash University, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.