Adjusted Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI‐RADS)

BACKGROUND: The TI-RADS guides the initial management of thyroid nodules, but the malignancy risk across different categories of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (CITNs), particularly AUS and FN, remains unclear. METHODS: We reviewed thyroid FNA specimens diagnosed as AUS or FN with TI-RADS scores of 3, 4, or 5 from 2017 to 2025. Clinical data, molecular results, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 919 CITNs were identified: 304 with TI-RADS 3, 454 with TI-RADS 4, and 161 with TI-RADS 5. In the absence of molecular alterations, the risk of malignancy (ROM) was low for AUS and FN in both TI-RADS 3 and 4 categories (< 10%). In contrast, TI-RADS 5 nodules diagnosed as AUS or FN had the highest ROM (56%). ROM similarly increased with the TI-RADS score. For AUS, ROM was 14% (TI-RADS 3), 31% (TI-RADS 4), and 60% (TI-RADS 5). For FN, ROM increased from 26% to 44% to 57% across TI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Notably, even AUS nodules without detectable mutations had a high ROM of 44% in TI-RADS 5, compared to 10% and 15% in TI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate distinctive ROMs among AUS and FN stratified by TI-RADS category and underscore the variable utility of molecular testing. TI-RADS 5 CITNs carry a significantly higher ROM even in the absence of molecular alterations, suggesting the importance of combining TI-RADS and TBSRTC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72215
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjusted Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI‐RADS)

Adebowale Adeniran, Sanhong Yu, Guoping Cai, Minhua Wang et al.
Cancer Medicine
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Adjusted Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI‐RADS)

Adebowale Adeniran, Sanhong Yu, Guoping Cai, Minhua Wang, Sara I. Pai, Rita Abi‐Raad, Jonathan Langdon, Jessica Zhao, John H. Sinard
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The TI-RADS guides the initial management of thyroid nodules, but the malignancy risk across different categories of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (CITNs), particularly AUS and FN, remains unclear. METHODS: We reviewed thyroid FNA specimens diagnosed as AUS or FN with TI-RADS scores of 3, 4, or 5 from 2017 to 2025. Clinical data, molecular results, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 919 CITNs were identified: 304 with TI-RADS 3, 454 with TI-RADS 4, and 161 with TI-RADS 5. In the absence of molecular alterations, the risk of malignancy (ROM) was low for AUS and FN in both TI-RADS 3 and 4 categories (< 10%). In contrast, TI-RADS 5 nodules diagnosed as AUS or FN had the highest ROM (56%). ROM similarly increased with the TI-RADS score. For AUS, ROM was 14% (TI-RADS 3), 31% (TI-RADS 4), and 60% (TI-RADS 5). For FN, ROM increased from 26% to 44% to 57% across TI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Notably, even AUS nodules without detectable mutations had a high ROM of 44% in TI-RADS 5, compared to 10% and 15% in TI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate distinctive ROMs among AUS and FN stratified by TI-RADS category and underscore the variable utility of molecular testing. TI-RADS 5 CITNs carry a significantly higher ROM even in the absence of molecular alterations, suggesting the importance of combining TI-RADS and TBSRTC.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(9)
Yale University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.