Hip anteroposterior radiographic indices for effective osteoporosis screening in female patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Osteoporosis in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty remains undiagnosed. Although hip radiographic indices have been proposed for screening, they have not been compared. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of eight indices for osteoporosis. The canal-bone ratio measured 7 cm below the lesser trochanter may be a useful screening tool. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis increases the risk of perioperative and postoperative fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, osteoporosis remains undiagnosed and untreated preoperatively. Several indices measured on hip anteroposterior radiographs have been proposed to screen for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, few studies have compared these indices, necessitating investigations to identify a practical and effective radiographic index. METHODS: Osteoporosis prevalence was assessed in 317 female patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before primary THA. The screening performance of eight radiographic indices was evaluated using anteroposterior hip radiographs for patients without previous diagnosis or treatment of osteoporosis: canal flare index (CFI), morphological cortical index (MCI), canal-bone ratio (CBR) at 2, 7, and 10 cm below the lesser trochanter and canal-bone area ratio (CBAR) measured at 2-7, 2-10, and 7-10 cm segments. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared among indices. RESULTS: Osteoporosis was identified in 129 patients (40.7%), of whom only 48 (37.2%) received treatment. The highest AUC values were observed for CBAR2-7 (0.801), CBAR7-10 (0.798), and CBR7 (0.798), followed by CBAR2-10 (0.785), CBR10 (0.766), CBR2 (0.740), CFI (0.696), and MCI (0.654). CBAR and CBR7 exhibited higher screening accuracy than other indices. CONCLUSION: The osteoporosis prevalence and treatment rates were 40.7% and 37.2%, respectively. Among the radiographic indices, CBR7 and CBARs demonstrated favorable screening performance, with CBR7 offering comparable accuracy and greater simplicity. CBR7 may serve as a practical and efficient screening tool for osteoporosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Osteoporosis
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-026-01760-3
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hip anteroposterior radiographic indices for effective osteoporosis screening in female patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Hirokazu Mae, Sotaro Kono, Ryota Nakaya, Kazuma Takashima et al.
Archives of Osteoporosis
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Hip anteroposterior radiographic indices for effective osteoporosis screening in female patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Hirokazu Mae, Sotaro Kono, Ryota Nakaya, Kazuma Takashima, Seiji Okada, 恭典 岡本, Keisuke Uemura, Tetsuro Tani, Katsuya Nakata, Hidetoshi Hamada, Tomoki Asano, Ryo Higuchi
article en

Abstract

Osteoporosis in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty remains undiagnosed. Although hip radiographic indices have been proposed for screening, they have not been compared. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of eight indices for osteoporosis. The canal-bone ratio measured 7 cm below the lesser trochanter may be a useful screening tool. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis increases the risk of perioperative and postoperative fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, osteoporosis remains undiagnosed and untreated preoperatively. Several indices measured on hip anteroposterior radiographs have been proposed to screen for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, few studies have compared these indices, necessitating investigations to identify a practical and effective radiographic index. METHODS: Osteoporosis prevalence was assessed in 317 female patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before primary THA. The screening performance of eight radiographic indices was evaluated using anteroposterior hip radiographs for patients without previous diagnosis or treatment of osteoporosis: canal flare index (CFI), morphological cortical index (MCI), canal-bone ratio (CBR) at 2, 7, and 10 cm below the lesser trochanter and canal-bone area ratio (CBAR) measured at 2-7, 2-10, and 7-10 cm segments. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared among indices. RESULTS: Osteoporosis was identified in 129 patients (40.7%), of whom only 48 (37.2%) received treatment. The highest AUC values were observed for CBAR2-7 (0.801), CBAR7-10 (0.798), and CBR7 (0.798), followed by CBAR2-10 (0.785), CBR10 (0.766), CBR2 (0.740), CFI (0.696), and MCI (0.654). CBAR and CBR7 exhibited higher screening accuracy than other indices. CONCLUSION: The osteoporosis prevalence and treatment rates were 40.7% and 37.2%, respectively. Among the radiographic indices, CBR7 and CBARs demonstrated favorable screening performance, with CBR7 offering comparable accuracy and greater simplicity. CBR7 may serve as a practical and efficient screening tool for osteoporosis.

Archives of OsteoporosisVol. 21(1)
Osaka Hospital (JP), Osaka University Hospital (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Osaka University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.