Injury Prevalence and Risk Factors in Professional and Amateur Breakdancers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional survey aimed to compare the 24-month injury prevalence between amateur and professional male breakdancers (also known as breakers or B-boys) in China and identify key injury characteristics associated with skill level. This study hypothesized that Chinese professional B-boys have a higher injury prevalence than amateurs and the injury characteristics differ in their association with technical movements and training condition. METHODS: A self-developed 27-item questionnaire covering three domains-basic information, training history, and injury characteristics-was distributed online to male breakers. Participants were classified into amateur (n=468) and professional (n=178) groups using a composite criterion combining self-assessed skill rank and cumulative train¬ing hours. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables using chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc pairwise comparisons. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were applied to analyze injury factors while accounting for within-dancer clustering of multiple injuries. RESULTS: Among the 646 dancers, 584 (90.4%) reported at least one injury, with no significant difference in injury prevalence between the amateur and professional groups (89.3% vs 93.3%, P=0.445). A total of 1,000 injury cases were documented. The most frequently injured sites were the wrist, knee, shoulder, and waist, with shoulder injuries significantly more common in professional dancers (21.3% vs 14.6%, P=0.031). Self-reported contributing factors included insufficient warm-up, fatigue, and perceived deficiencies in basic skills. Over 80% of dancers lacked professional medical support. Exploratory chi-square tests revealed that shoulder, knee, and wrist injuries were related with technical movements; however, these patterns were unadjusted for exposure time and therefore reflect only injury distribution, not movement-specific risk. CONCLUSIONS: Injury prevalence was similarly high in amateur and professional B-boys, with no significant between-group differences. Commonly injured sites and self-reported contributing factors, together with the lack of medical support, highlight the priorities for prevention. The movement-injury patterns warrant further investigation in future prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Problems of Performing Artists
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2026.03012
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injury Prevalence and Risk Factors in Professional and Amateur Breakdancers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Lu Bai, HuiYe Jia, Bo Wang, XiYang Zhang
Medical Problems of Performing Artists
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

Injury Prevalence and Risk Factors in Professional and Amateur Breakdancers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Lu Bai, HuiYe Jia, Bo Wang, XiYang Zhang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional survey aimed to compare the 24-month injury prevalence between amateur and professional male breakdancers (also known as breakers or B-boys) in China and identify key injury characteristics associated with skill level. This study hypothesized that Chinese professional B-boys have a higher injury prevalence than amateurs and the injury characteristics differ in their association with technical movements and training condition. METHODS: A self-developed 27-item questionnaire covering three domains-basic information, training history, and injury characteristics-was distributed online to male breakers. Participants were classified into amateur (n=468) and professional (n=178) groups using a composite criterion combining self-assessed skill rank and cumulative train¬ing hours. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables using chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for post-hoc pairwise comparisons. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were applied to analyze injury factors while accounting for within-dancer clustering of multiple injuries. RESULTS: Among the 646 dancers, 584 (90.4%) reported at least one injury, with no significant difference in injury prevalence between the amateur and professional groups (89.3% vs 93.3%, P=0.445). A total of 1,000 injury cases were documented. The most frequently injured sites were the wrist, knee, shoulder, and waist, with shoulder injuries significantly more common in professional dancers (21.3% vs 14.6%, P=0.031). Self-reported contributing factors included insufficient warm-up, fatigue, and perceived deficiencies in basic skills. Over 80% of dancers lacked professional medical support. Exploratory chi-square tests revealed that shoulder, knee, and wrist injuries were related with technical movements; however, these patterns were unadjusted for exposure time and therefore reflect only injury distribution, not movement-specific risk. CONCLUSIONS: Injury prevalence was similarly high in amateur and professional B-boys, with no significant between-group differences. Commonly injured sites and self-reported contributing factors, together with the lack of medical support, highlight the priorities for prevention. The movement-injury patterns warrant further investigation in future prospective studies.

Medical Problems of Performing ArtistsVol. 41(3)
Beijing Sport University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.