Convergent Parallel Mixed-Method Study of Frameworks and Consideration of Ethical AI-assisted Research Paper

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies are being adopted both in academic research work as the emerging development of writing. Benefits and advantages these tools provide, however, come with ethical issues that challenge authorship, transparency, bias-base of research and research integrity. In this study we explore the affordances and constraints in AI-assisted writing tools and argue for an ethical framework enabling their effective use in an academic setting. We gathered data from 200 participants including academic researchers, graduate students, university administrative, AI developers and ethicists. Results of perceived benefits and risks of AI tools reliably predict ethical concerns, to some extent moderated by demographic group. Policymakers, researchers and institutions are outlined in the study’s horizon on how AI integration for academic writing can be ethically done. landmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American journal of psychology
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65696/001c.168759
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Convergent Parallel Mixed-Method Study of Frameworks and Consideration of Ethical AI-assisted Research Paper

Kimberly Ann S. Cantilero, Antonio Ponciano L. Rodil, Juvenal Dalimeg, Kezia Rapha de Guzman et al.
North American journal of psychology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Convergent Parallel Mixed-Method Study of Frameworks and Consideration of Ethical AI-assisted Research Paper

Kimberly Ann S. Cantilero, Antonio Ponciano L. Rodil, Juvenal Dalimeg, Kezia Rapha de Guzman, Jan Ashley D. Casco, Michael U. Jimenez
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies are being adopted both in academic research work as the emerging development of writing. Benefits and advantages these tools provide, however, come with ethical issues that challenge authorship, transparency, bias-base of research and research integrity. In this study we explore the affordances and constraints in AI-assisted writing tools and argue for an ethical framework enabling their effective use in an academic setting. We gathered data from 200 participants including academic researchers, graduate students, university administrative, AI developers and ethicists. Results of perceived benefits and risks of AI tools reliably predict ethical concerns, to some extent moderated by demographic group. Policymakers, researchers and institutions are outlined in the study’s horizon on how AI integration for academic writing can be ethically done. landmarks.

North American journal of psychology
Clark University (US), Far Eastern University (TH), Far Eastern University (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.