Human‐Centred AI Teammate Design: A Participatory Method for Eliciting Business Needs in Complex Problem‐Solving

ABSTRACT Introducing artificial intelligence (AI) teammates into organizations and enabling human–AI collaboration can improve responses to complex problems. However, current methods for identifying AI teammate requirements in complex problem‐solving situations often overlook the experience and knowledge of business staff and lack a human‐centred perspective. Therefore, this study proposes a method for identifying AI teammate requirements for business staff (IATReBS), with a particular emphasis on leveraging their experience and knowledge. We use the design science research methodology to combine theoretical insights from participatory design with practical insights from user interviews (15 participants) to develop IATReBS. The method guides business staff in identifying the requirements of AI teammates for complex problems in specific business contexts. Results from the proof‐of‐concept (15 interviews) and proof‐of‐value (a two‐month experiment yielding 24 questionnaires) evaluations provide initial evidence that the IATReBS method can help participants identify AI teammate requirements in complex problem‐solving contexts, particularly regarding feasibility, usability and perceived usefulness. Our research provides new insights and a method for helping organizations introduce AI teammates from a human‐centred perspective, thereby contributing to the externalization of tacit knowledge. Our research offers methodological guidance for organizations to acquire AI teammates that are aligned with clear application scenarios and meet user expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70146
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human‐Centred AI Teammate Design: A Participatory Method for Eliciting Business Needs in Complex Problem‐Solving

Juanqiong Gou, Zuopeng Zhang, Luís M. Camarinha-Matos, Wenqiang Li et al.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human‐Centred AI Teammate Design: A Participatory Method for Eliciting Business Needs in Complex Problem‐Solving

Juanqiong Gou, Zuopeng Zhang, Luís M. Camarinha-Matos, Wenqiang Li, Fangcong Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introducing artificial intelligence (AI) teammates into organizations and enabling human–AI collaboration can improve responses to complex problems. However, current methods for identifying AI teammate requirements in complex problem‐solving situations often overlook the experience and knowledge of business staff and lack a human‐centred perspective. Therefore, this study proposes a method for identifying AI teammate requirements for business staff (IATReBS), with a particular emphasis on leveraging their experience and knowledge. We use the design science research methodology to combine theoretical insights from participatory design with practical insights from user interviews (15 participants) to develop IATReBS. The method guides business staff in identifying the requirements of AI teammates for complex problems in specific business contexts. Results from the proof‐of‐concept (15 interviews) and proof‐of‐value (a two‐month experiment yielding 24 questionnaires) evaluations provide initial evidence that the IATReBS method can help participants identify AI teammate requirements in complex problem‐solving contexts, particularly regarding feasibility, usability and perceived usefulness. Our research provides new insights and a method for helping organizations introduce AI teammates from a human‐centred perspective, thereby contributing to the externalization of tacit knowledge. Our research offers methodological guidance for organizations to acquire AI teammates that are aligned with clear application scenarios and meet user expectations.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
University of North Florida (US), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.