Public Engagement in the Design of Urban Blue‐Green Infrastructure: Contrasting Approaches and Project Outcomes in Ōtautahi Christchurch

ABSTRACT Although blue‐green infrastructure (BGI) is increasingly used to mitigate the challenges that climate change poses for cities, public involvement in its design is uneven. Here we examine three BGI projects in Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand, documenting how local communities and mana whenua were engaged in their design and the impact on project outcomes. Across the projects, we observed both narrowly consultative and more collaborative forms of public engagement. Collaborative approaches were found to deliver socio‐cultural and ecological benefits beyond those usually associated with flood risk reduction infrastructure. We conclude by outlining how collaborative design approaches can enhance BGI benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Geographer
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.70030
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Engagement in the Design of Urban Blue‐Green Infrastructure: Contrasting Approaches and Project Outcomes in Ōtautahi Christchurch

Tyler McNabb, Frances J. Charters, Rita Dionisio, Edward Challies et al.
New Zealand Geographer
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Public Engagement in the Design of Urban Blue‐Green Infrastructure: Contrasting Approaches and Project Outcomes in Ōtautahi Christchurch

Tyler McNabb, Frances J. Charters, Rita Dionisio, Edward Challies, David Conradson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although blue‐green infrastructure (BGI) is increasingly used to mitigate the challenges that climate change poses for cities, public involvement in its design is uneven. Here we examine three BGI projects in Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand, documenting how local communities and mana whenua were engaged in their design and the impact on project outcomes. Across the projects, we observed both narrowly consultative and more collaborative forms of public engagement. Collaborative approaches were found to deliver socio‐cultural and ecological benefits beyond those usually associated with flood risk reduction infrastructure. We conclude by outlining how collaborative design approaches can enhance BGI benefits.

New Zealand GeographerVol. 82(3)
University of Canterbury (NZ), Environment Canterbury (NZ), University of Waikato (NZ)
University of Canterbury
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public Engagement in the Design of Urban Blue‐Green Infrastructure: Contrasting Approaches and Project Outcomes in Ōtautahi Christchurch — Tyler McNabb, Frances J. Charters, et al. · New Zealand Geographer (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS