Dependent contractors in South Korea’s incomplete multi-pillar pension system

Drawing on a survey of 1,053 dependent contractors (DCs) in ten occupations, conducted by the Korea Platform and Freelancer Worker Mutual Aid(KPFWMA), this study examines how DCs are positioned within South Korea’s ‘incomplete’ multi-pillar pension system (MPPS), conceptualized along three dimensions: statutory, administrative, and functional incompleteness. The results show precarious integration: about 40% of respondents lack any pension coverage, while only one in ten attains full multi-pillar protection. Coverage is stratified primarily by age and income, occupational differences are comparatively muted, and second-pillar coverage obtained through DC work itself is nearly absent. Latent demand for a collective retirement mutual-aid scheme is nonetheless substantial within the sample, including 43.8% of KPFWMA non-members. The findings indicate that an incomplete MPPS converts labour-market precarity into old-age insecurity from the point of enrolment onward, and support mandatory contributions by business owners, contribution subsidies for low-income participants, and transitional collective arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2026.2723285
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dependent contractors in South Korea’s incomplete multi-pillar pension system

Jaewook Nahm
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Dependent contractors in South Korea’s incomplete multi-pillar pension system

Jaewook Nahm
article en

Abstract

Drawing on a survey of 1,053 dependent contractors (DCs) in ten occupations, conducted by the Korea Platform and Freelancer Worker Mutual Aid(KPFWMA), this study examines how DCs are positioned within South Korea’s ‘incomplete’ multi-pillar pension system (MPPS), conceptualized along three dimensions: statutory, administrative, and functional incompleteness. The results show precarious integration: about 40% of respondents lack any pension coverage, while only one in ten attains full multi-pillar protection. Coverage is stratified primarily by age and income, occupational differences are comparatively muted, and second-pillar coverage obtained through DC work itself is nearly absent. Latent demand for a collective retirement mutual-aid scheme is nonetheless substantial within the sample, including 43.8% of KPFWMA non-members. The findings indicate that an incomplete MPPS converts labour-market precarity into old-age insecurity from the point of enrolment onward, and support mandatory contributions by business owners, contribution subsidies for low-income participants, and transitional collective arrangements.

Journal of Asian Public Policy
Korea National University of Education (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dependent contractors in South Korea’s incomplete multi-pillar pension system — Jaewook Nahm · Journal of Asian Public Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS