Effect of Multiple Centralization Sutures on Meniscal Extrusion and Contact Pressures in a Cadaveric Model of Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Background: Adding a centralization suture (CS) during repair of a posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tear may decrease meniscal extrusion and osteoarthritis progression. However, the number and optimal placement of CSs remain unclear. Hypothesis: Increasing numbers and changing localization of CSs would not influence the degree of postoperative extrusion or joint contact pressures. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact pressures were assessed using a 3-dimensional motion capture system and pressure sensors in 9 human cadaveric knees. A nonanatomic root repair was created to simulate persistent meniscal extrusion after a PMMR repair. Each knee was tested under 10 conditions: (1) intact, (2) PMMR tear, (3) root repair, (4) CS at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) (CS1), (5) CS midway between CS 1 and CS 3 (CS2), (6) CS at the midpoint between the MCL and posterior root attachment (CS3), and (7-10) combinations of these CSs (all CSs were in addition to the root repair). Analysis of variance testing was used for analyses of pressure data and extrusion measurements. Results: There was no significant difference in medial contact pressure between the intact state and the states with root repair in combination with any CS configuration ( P > .05). Contact pressures were reduced compared to the root repair state for CS1 alone at 0° ( P = .014); the combination of CS2 and CS3 at 0°, 60°, and 120° ( P ≤ .038); and the combination of all 3 CSs at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion ( P ≤ .037). Extrusion was reduced compared to the root repair state for CS1 alone at 60° ( P = .043) and all 3 CSs combined at 90° of flexion ( P < .009). Conclusion: A single CS placed at the posterior border of the MCL decreased medial contact pressures at 0° and reduced extrusion at 60° of flexion. The combined use of 2 CSs placed at the posteromedial meniscus junction reduced contact pressures across multiple flexion angles (0°, 60°, and 120°). The combination of 3 CSs reduced contact pressures at 0°, 30°, and 60° and extrusion at 90°. Until clinical studies are conducted, the benefits of additional CSs should be weighed against time and cost. Clinical Relevance: These findings should guide surgeons on the optimal number and placement of CSs to minimize meniscal extrusion and restore medial compartment contact pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465261475396
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Multiple Centralization Sutures on Meniscal Extrusion and Contact Pressures in a Cadaveric Model of Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Eivind Inderhaug, Mathias Andersen, Christopher M. LaPrade, Frede Frihagen et al.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Effect of Multiple Centralization Sutures on Meniscal Extrusion and Contact Pressures in a Cadaveric Model of Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Eivind Inderhaug, Mathias Andersen, Christopher M. LaPrade, Frede Frihagen, Robert F. LaPrade, Mitchell Carlson, Jacob Ngobi, Luke V. Tollefson, Bjørge Fladberg
article en

Abstract

Background: Adding a centralization suture (CS) during repair of a posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tear may decrease meniscal extrusion and osteoarthritis progression. However, the number and optimal placement of CSs remain unclear. Hypothesis: Increasing numbers and changing localization of CSs would not influence the degree of postoperative extrusion or joint contact pressures. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact pressures were assessed using a 3-dimensional motion capture system and pressure sensors in 9 human cadaveric knees. A nonanatomic root repair was created to simulate persistent meniscal extrusion after a PMMR repair. Each knee was tested under 10 conditions: (1) intact, (2) PMMR tear, (3) root repair, (4) CS at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) (CS1), (5) CS midway between CS 1 and CS 3 (CS2), (6) CS at the midpoint between the MCL and posterior root attachment (CS3), and (7-10) combinations of these CSs (all CSs were in addition to the root repair). Analysis of variance testing was used for analyses of pressure data and extrusion measurements. Results: There was no significant difference in medial contact pressure between the intact state and the states with root repair in combination with any CS configuration ( P > .05). Contact pressures were reduced compared to the root repair state for CS1 alone at 0° ( P = .014); the combination of CS2 and CS3 at 0°, 60°, and 120° ( P ≤ .038); and the combination of all 3 CSs at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion ( P ≤ .037). Extrusion was reduced compared to the root repair state for CS1 alone at 60° ( P = .043) and all 3 CSs combined at 90° of flexion ( P < .009). Conclusion: A single CS placed at the posterior border of the MCL decreased medial contact pressures at 0° and reduced extrusion at 60° of flexion. The combined use of 2 CSs placed at the posteromedial meniscus junction reduced contact pressures across multiple flexion angles (0°, 60°, and 120°). The combination of 3 CSs reduced contact pressures at 0°, 30°, and 60° and extrusion at 90°. Until clinical studies are conducted, the benefits of additional CSs should be weighed against time and cost. Clinical Relevance: These findings should guide surgeons on the optimal number and placement of CSs to minimize meniscal extrusion and restore medial compartment contact pressures.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine
University of Oslo (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Østfold Hospital Trust (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam), Sykehuset Østfold, UNIFOR
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.