Advancements in deep learning for early breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence models in low resource settings

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), compounded by fewer radiologists available and resources for diagnosis. A narrative review that summarizes 45 peer-reviewed publications to date from 2018 to 2025 is presented for deep learning (DL) models for mammography detection for breast cancer, targeting low-resource-critical architectures for development in LMIC settings. We compare convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN-support vector machine (SVM) models, recurrent/LSTM networks, and lightweight architectures such as MobileNet and EfficientNet. In quantitative synthesis the reported diagnostic accuracy for MobileNet is between 89 and 92%, supported with 128 MB RAM and 0.3 GFLOPs. Therefore it is appropriate for offline edge devices (smartphones, NVIDIA Jetson Nano). EfficientNet achieves 91–94% accuracy—though it requires stable internet to enable cloud deployment, due to its greater parameter size (5.3 million). Both architectures reduce false positives by 7 to 69% and false negatives by 9% compared to traditional computer-aided detection, though most evidence is retrospective. The most important contributions from this review are: (1) a quantitative comparison of efficiency for edge versus cloud deployment, (2) detection of dataset bias (no LMIC-specific validation exists), and (3) practical recommendations regarding infrastructure, regulatory pathways, and privacy-preserving federated learning. Limitations include cross-study heterogeneity in datasets (CBIS-DDSM, INbreast, MIAS) and evaluation protocols. We conclude that MobileNet and EfficientNet provide good trade-offs for LMICs but call for prospective trials and locally curated datasets before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Data
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-026-00116-z
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancements in deep learning for early breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence models in low resource settings

Harry D. Mafukidze, Enerst Edozie, Abid Yahya, Action Nechibvute et al.
Discover Data
AI in cancer detection
article

Advancements in deep learning for early breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence models in low resource settings

Harry D. Mafukidze, Enerst Edozie, Abid Yahya, Action Nechibvute, Prosper Mbire, Kennedy Chitiza
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), compounded by fewer radiologists available and resources for diagnosis. A narrative review that summarizes 45 peer-reviewed publications to date from 2018 to 2025 is presented for deep learning (DL) models for mammography detection for breast cancer, targeting low-resource-critical architectures for development in LMIC settings. We compare convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN-support vector machine (SVM) models, recurrent/LSTM networks, and lightweight architectures such as MobileNet and EfficientNet. In quantitative synthesis the reported diagnostic accuracy for MobileNet is between 89 and 92%, supported with 128 MB RAM and 0.3 GFLOPs. Therefore it is appropriate for offline edge devices (smartphones, NVIDIA Jetson Nano). EfficientNet achieves 91–94% accuracy—though it requires stable internet to enable cloud deployment, due to its greater parameter size (5.3 million). Both architectures reduce false positives by 7 to 69% and false negatives by 9% compared to traditional computer-aided detection, though most evidence is retrospective. The most important contributions from this review are: (1) a quantitative comparison of efficiency for edge versus cloud deployment, (2) detection of dataset bias (no LMIC-specific validation exists), and (3) practical recommendations regarding infrastructure, regulatory pathways, and privacy-preserving federated learning. Limitations include cross-study heterogeneity in datasets (CBIS-DDSM, INbreast, MIAS) and evaluation protocols. We conclude that MobileNet and EfficientNet provide good trade-offs for LMICs but call for prospective trials and locally curated datasets before clinical implementation.

Discover DataVol. 4(1)
Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BW), Kampala International University (UG), Midlands State University (ZW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.