Identity Archaeology and the Negotiation of Trust: Positionality in Ethnographic Research with Kurdish Communities in Japan

This article examines how researcher identity, trust, and positionality are negotiated in ethnographic research with Kurdish communities in Japan. Drawing on 3 months of fieldwork with twenty Kurdish participants in Saitama Prefecture and surrounding community spaces, I analyze participant observation, informal interviews, and digital interactions. Trust was not established through shared identity but through negotiated tests involving regional origin, language, political positioning, social media visibility, domestic participation, and cultural performance. To analyze these dynamics, I develop three concepts: identity archaeology, reciprocal transparency, and performative participation. These concepts show how participants actively evaluated, challenged, and co-produced my position as a Turkish female researcher. The article contributes to contemporary ethnographic methodology by demonstrating that insider–outsider categories are insufficient in diasporic fields shaped by legal precarity, historical conflict, unequal power relations, and digital intimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416261477585
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identity Archaeology and the Negotiation of Trust: Positionality in Ethnographic Research with Kurdish Communities in Japan

Işıl Bayraktar
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Identity Archaeology and the Negotiation of Trust: Positionality in Ethnographic Research with Kurdish Communities in Japan

Işıl Bayraktar
article en

Abstract

This article examines how researcher identity, trust, and positionality are negotiated in ethnographic research with Kurdish communities in Japan. Drawing on 3 months of fieldwork with twenty Kurdish participants in Saitama Prefecture and surrounding community spaces, I analyze participant observation, informal interviews, and digital interactions. Trust was not established through shared identity but through negotiated tests involving regional origin, language, political positioning, social media visibility, domestic participation, and cultural performance. To analyze these dynamics, I develop three concepts: identity archaeology, reciprocal transparency, and performative participation. These concepts show how participants actively evaluated, challenged, and co-produced my position as a Turkish female researcher. The article contributes to contemporary ethnographic methodology by demonstrating that insider–outsider categories are insufficient in diasporic fields shaped by legal precarity, historical conflict, unequal power relations, and digital intimacy.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Kyoto University (JP)
Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identity Archaeology and the Negotiation of Trust: Positionality in Ethnographic Research with Kurdish Communities in Japan — Işıl Bayraktar · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS