Before birth and beyond: Advance care planning in perinatal and neonatal palliative care – A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is a core component of Palliative Care, yet how it is organized and used in practice remains variably described. AIM: To map how advance care planning is put into practice within Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care and identify contextual enablers and barriers across settings and stakeholder groups. DESIGN: Scoping review registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/c3mkx/overview; May 2, 2025). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus (2014-2024). Participants included parents/legal guardians, healthcare professionals, and infant/dyad record-based data eligible for Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care; Concept covered delivery, content, timing, documentation, and barriers/enablers; Context was perinatal/neonatal settings in any country. PRISMA-Scoping Review guidelines were followed; Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used. Data were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, mostly from Europe. Advance care planning was consistently associated-descriptively-with clearer communication and more structured end-of-life decision-making, with sustained emphasis on infant comfort/symptom management. Where birth/comfort plans were standardized and accessible, documentation/implementation improved; a before-after analysis also reported gains in multidisciplinary communication, documentation of parents' views, clarity of end-of-life status, and use of comfort-oriented regimens. Parents/families highlighted validation, preparedness, agency, and memory-making. Professional/service-level factors underscored training, templates, early referral, and parallel planning. Concordance and validated parent-reported measures were rarely quantified. CONCLUSIONS: Within Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care, advance care planning organizes communication/decisions while supporting infant comfort with standardized, shared plans. Practice should prioritize structured conversations, embedded documentation, early referral, and training; research should prospectively evaluate standardized pathways, measure parent-centered outcomes and concordance, and strengthen neonatal pharmacology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palliative Medicine
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261478449
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Before birth and beyond: Advance care planning in perinatal and neonatal palliative care – A scoping review

Paulo Reis-Pina, Maria Beatriz Mariano-Menezes
Palliative Medicine
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Before birth and beyond: Advance care planning in perinatal and neonatal palliative care – A scoping review

Paulo Reis-Pina, Maria Beatriz Mariano-Menezes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is a core component of Palliative Care, yet how it is organized and used in practice remains variably described. AIM: To map how advance care planning is put into practice within Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care and identify contextual enablers and barriers across settings and stakeholder groups. DESIGN: Scoping review registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/c3mkx/overview; May 2, 2025). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus (2014-2024). Participants included parents/legal guardians, healthcare professionals, and infant/dyad record-based data eligible for Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care; Concept covered delivery, content, timing, documentation, and barriers/enablers; Context was perinatal/neonatal settings in any country. PRISMA-Scoping Review guidelines were followed; Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used. Data were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, mostly from Europe. Advance care planning was consistently associated-descriptively-with clearer communication and more structured end-of-life decision-making, with sustained emphasis on infant comfort/symptom management. Where birth/comfort plans were standardized and accessible, documentation/implementation improved; a before-after analysis also reported gains in multidisciplinary communication, documentation of parents' views, clarity of end-of-life status, and use of comfort-oriented regimens. Parents/families highlighted validation, preparedness, agency, and memory-making. Professional/service-level factors underscored training, templates, early referral, and parallel planning. Concordance and validated parent-reported measures were rarely quantified. CONCLUSIONS: Within Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care, advance care planning organizes communication/decisions while supporting infant comfort with standardized, shared plans. Practice should prioritize structured conversations, embedded documentation, early referral, and training; research should prospectively evaluate standardized pathways, measure parent-centered outcomes and concordance, and strengthen neonatal pharmacology.

Palliative Medicine
University of Lisbon (PT), Hospital de Santa Maria (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.