Cumulative spatial assessment of observed wildlife-vehicle collisions based on indicator species thresholds
Global road network expansion has exacerbated wildlife-vehicle collisions. However, traditional risk assessments predominantly assume a linear relationship between landscape features and observed collision quantities, overlooking the non-linear threshold characteristics of ecological responses. This study aimed to quantify the non-linear response thresholds of terrestrial vertebrates to diverse landscape conditions and to characterize national spatial patterns of threshold-based cumulative scores. We further examined how positive- and negative-response taxa were associated with different landscape-cover intervals. Using extensive citizen science survey data across mainland China, we employed Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis at an optimal spatial scale of 500 m. We then integrated community-level abrupt change points into a threshold-based cumulative scoring system. Positive-response taxa experienced abrupt increases in observed roadkill quantities within specific landscape-cover intervals. Negative-response taxa exhibited declines in reported records under relatively low levels of impervious surface coverage or specific landscape-cover conditions. High-scoring road segments were concentrated in the agricultural and urban landscapes of southeastern China, reflecting the geographic co-occurrence of multiple landscape thresholds associated with increases in reported roadkill quantities. Low-scoring road segments contained fewer reported collisions, but this did not necessarily indicate ecological safety. These contrasting patterns could arise from multiple ecological and observation-related processes, including differences in wildlife occurrence, movement behavior, road-crossing probability, reporting effort, and detectability. The identified landscape thresholds provide a hypothesis-generating framework for exploring spatial variation in reported WVC patterns. To transition from broad-scale screening to targeted mitigation prioritization, future research should validate these patterns by incorporating localized reporting effort, road exposure, traffic intensity, and biogeographic turnover.
Authors
- Yang Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-5518)
- Kai Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-3346)
- Sarah Raymond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0266-0278)
- Yuhang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-804X)
- Zhongqiu Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-293X)
- Feng Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-977X)
- Linyou Gu
- Xinmiao Chen
- Le Yang
- Zixi Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2466-0320)
Institutions
- Tibet University (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
- Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
- Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN)
- Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN)
- Nanjing University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Landscape Ecology
- Published
- 2026-08-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-026-02449-1
- Primary Topic
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China