Water Diplomacy Index: A Tool for Evaluating Cooperation on Shared Water Resources

This study evaluates the challenges of water diplomacy (WD) activities involved in managing shared water resources. Effective management is much needed in view of the increasing demand for freshwater coupled with possibilities of conflicts arising from some shared water resources. The study introduces, develops, and applies the Water Diplomacy Index (WDI) as a new assessment tool that examines WD practices in managing shared water resources. The WDI primarily assesses how countries deal with increasing water scarcity, conflict resolution, and mitigation of disputes over shared water resources. The index builds a multifaceted approach from case studies of shared water resource management with major parameters involving political dynamics, preventive measures, integrative approaches, cooperative governance, and technical capabilities. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) utilized intensive qualitative content analysis of the literature and a panel of international and regional experts in WD led to the identification and ranking of the different criteria to be incorporated into the WDI. The WDI ranked five shared river basins (Rhine River Basin (RRB), Columbia River Basin (CRB), Senegal River Basin (SRB), Yarmouk River Basin (YRB), and the Euphrates–Tigris River Basin (ETRB)) based on their WD practice mechanisms, providing insights into methods that help governments cooperate and resolve conflicts. The findings reveal disparities in the effectiveness of WD across regions, with examples like the RRB demonstrating efficient management, while others, such as the YRB, face significant challenges. The study offers a structured approach for policymakers and stakeholders to enhance collaborative water governance, encouraging proactive diplomacy to mitigate potential disputes and promote sustainable use of shared water resources. Ultimately, the WDI offers a structured, comparative measure of water diplomacy practice across basins that policymakers and stakeholders can use to identify gaps in current cooperation mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18172116
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Diplomacy Index: A Tool for Evaluating Cooperation on Shared Water Resources

Mohammed O.J. Azzam, Ammar A. Albalasmeh, Muheeb Awawdeh, Eman Hamada et al.
Water
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Water Diplomacy Index: A Tool for Evaluating Cooperation on Shared Water Resources

Mohammed O.J. Azzam, Ammar A. Albalasmeh, Muheeb Awawdeh, Eman Hamada, Wasim Barham, Mutawakil Obeidat, Mufleh Alalaween
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the challenges of water diplomacy (WD) activities involved in managing shared water resources. Effective management is much needed in view of the increasing demand for freshwater coupled with possibilities of conflicts arising from some shared water resources. The study introduces, develops, and applies the Water Diplomacy Index (WDI) as a new assessment tool that examines WD practices in managing shared water resources. The WDI primarily assesses how countries deal with increasing water scarcity, conflict resolution, and mitigation of disputes over shared water resources. The index builds a multifaceted approach from case studies of shared water resource management with major parameters involving political dynamics, preventive measures, integrative approaches, cooperative governance, and technical capabilities. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) utilized intensive qualitative content analysis of the literature and a panel of international and regional experts in WD led to the identification and ranking of the different criteria to be incorporated into the WDI. The WDI ranked five shared river basins (Rhine River Basin (RRB), Columbia River Basin (CRB), Senegal River Basin (SRB), Yarmouk River Basin (YRB), and the Euphrates–Tigris River Basin (ETRB)) based on their WD practice mechanisms, providing insights into methods that help governments cooperate and resolve conflicts. The findings reveal disparities in the effectiveness of WD across regions, with examples like the RRB demonstrating efficient management, while others, such as the YRB, face significant challenges. The study offers a structured approach for policymakers and stakeholders to enhance collaborative water governance, encouraging proactive diplomacy to mitigate potential disputes and promote sustainable use of shared water resources. Ultimately, the WDI offers a structured, comparative measure of water diplomacy practice across basins that policymakers and stakeholders can use to identify gaps in current cooperation mechanisms.

WaterVol. 18(17)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NO), Yarmouk University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.