148 Using real-world data from GlioCova to assess the feasibility and revise the design of the ARISTOCRAT trial in recurrent glioblastoma

Abstract Introduction ARISTOCRAT is a blinded trial of cannabinoids with standard-of-care temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma, which initially aimed to recruit 234 patients over 18 months. Recruitment started on 03-Feb-2023, and it soon became apparent, from screening and recruitment data, that our initial site feasibility data was not reflected in actual recruitment. Estimating the eligible population size for studies is a recognised challenge. National cancer data is difficult to access and does not include the detail required to judge specific trial eligibility. In view of these problems, we explored alternative methods to estimate recruitment. Methods GlioCova is a comprehensive national dataset of all ∼56k adult primary brain tumour patients in England (2013-2018). We used this to estimate the number of eligible patients based on trial eligibility criteria for previous treatment (received sufficient adjuvant temozolomide and radiotherapy), IDH WT and MGMT methylation status. Results We estimated that <100 patients/year would be eligible for screening for ARISTOCRAT. Based on previous studies in this population, we would not anticipate more than 47% of screened patients to be randomised. Taken together, these data demonstrated that our initial recruitment targets were unrealistic. This prompted a statistical redesign of the trial from a rolling phase II/III to a conventional randomised phase II. This allowed revision of recruitment targets (96-120 patients) whilst maintaining 80% power to detect a 0.65 HR based on a 10% one-sided significance level within a practical and agreeable timeframe. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to robustly address brain tumour trial recruitment using real-world data, and we believe this approach should be considered for future trials to avoid optimistic but unrealistic feasibility assessments that could lead to study failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.059
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

148 Using real-world data from GlioCova to assess the feasibility and revise the design of the ARISTOCRAT trial in recurrent glioblastoma

Divya Bhaskaran, Rhys Mant, Kerlann Le Calvez, Prof Lucinda Billingham et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

148 Using real-world data from GlioCova to assess the feasibility and revise the design of the ARISTOCRAT trial in recurrent glioblastoma

Divya Bhaskaran, Rhys Mant, Kerlann Le Calvez, Prof Lucinda Billingham, Dr Fiona Collinson, Joshua Savage, Amanda Kirkham, Matthew Williams, Susan Short
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction ARISTOCRAT is a blinded trial of cannabinoids with standard-of-care temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma, which initially aimed to recruit 234 patients over 18 months. Recruitment started on 03-Feb-2023, and it soon became apparent, from screening and recruitment data, that our initial site feasibility data was not reflected in actual recruitment. Estimating the eligible population size for studies is a recognised challenge. National cancer data is difficult to access and does not include the detail required to judge specific trial eligibility. In view of these problems, we explored alternative methods to estimate recruitment. Methods GlioCova is a comprehensive national dataset of all ∼56k adult primary brain tumour patients in England (2013-2018). We used this to estimate the number of eligible patients based on trial eligibility criteria for previous treatment (received sufficient adjuvant temozolomide and radiotherapy), IDH WT and MGMT methylation status. Results We estimated that <100 patients/year would be eligible for screening for ARISTOCRAT. Based on previous studies in this population, we would not anticipate more than 47% of screened patients to be randomised. Taken together, these data demonstrated that our initial recruitment targets were unrealistic. This prompted a statistical redesign of the trial from a rolling phase II/III to a conventional randomised phase II. This allowed revision of recruitment targets (96-120 patients) whilst maintaining 80% power to detect a 0.65 HR based on a 10% one-sided significance level within a practical and agreeable timeframe. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to robustly address brain tumour trial recruitment using real-world data, and we believe this approach should be considered for future trials to avoid optimistic but unrealistic feasibility assessments that could lead to study failure.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.