The Interpretive Graph Overlay: Modeling Case Law as Normative Events for Deterministic Legal Retrieval

Legal retrieval systems may recover the text of a statute as it stood on a given date while missing the judicial interpretation that then governed its application. This paper introduces the Interpretive Graph Overlay, an extension of the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph) framework that represents adjudication as an event acting on a normative target. Judicial decisions remain versioned documentary objects, while curated adjudicative Actions produce temporally scoped Interpretive Versions carrying the relevant ratio, holding, authority, and scope.The overlay reuses four application-level primitives—Item, Version, Action, and TextUnit—through a shared event topology rather than introducing a separate case-law ontology. Where a statutory provision exists, its textual Version may coexist with one or more interpretive overlays; in judge-made domains, successive Interpretive Versions may instead represent authoritative articulations of a doctrine or the authority state of a scoped proposition. Retrieval is deterministic only in the bounded sense adopted here: once canonical identifiers, temporal parameters, and curated graph assertions are fixed, structural and temporal traversals are reproducible; legal applicability remains the result of an explicit jurisdiction-specific authority-resolution policy.Four manually encoded case studies exercise interpretive mutation, constitutional dialogue, concurrent panel interpretations and institutional unification, and the evolution of the English duty-recognition methodology from Donoghue v. Stevenson to Robinson. The public artifact includes the JSON encodings, a browser viewer driven by a shared temporal-resolution engine, structural validation, and executable behavioral tests for fixtures, interval boundaries, input normalization, and equivalent timestamp representations.Expanded author version of a two-page demonstration paper accepted at the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2026). The ACM Version of Record, once published, should be cited by DOI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22132537
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Interpretive Graph Overlay: Modeling Case Law as Normative Events for Deterministic Legal Retrieval

Hudson de Martim
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Law
preprint

The Interpretive Graph Overlay: Modeling Case Law as Normative Events for Deterministic Legal Retrieval

Hudson de Martim
preprint en

Abstract

Legal retrieval systems may recover the text of a statute as it stood on a given date while missing the judicial interpretation that then governed its application. This paper introduces the Interpretive Graph Overlay, an extension of the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph) framework that represents adjudication as an event acting on a normative target. Judicial decisions remain versioned documentary objects, while curated adjudicative Actions produce temporally scoped Interpretive Versions carrying the relevant ratio, holding, authority, and scope.The overlay reuses four application-level primitives—Item, Version, Action, and TextUnit—through a shared event topology rather than introducing a separate case-law ontology. Where a statutory provision exists, its textual Version may coexist with one or more interpretive overlays; in judge-made domains, successive Interpretive Versions may instead represent authoritative articulations of a doctrine or the authority state of a scoped proposition. Retrieval is deterministic only in the bounded sense adopted here: once canonical identifiers, temporal parameters, and curated graph assertions are fixed, structural and temporal traversals are reproducible; legal applicability remains the result of an explicit jurisdiction-specific authority-resolution policy.Four manually encoded case studies exercise interpretive mutation, constitutional dialogue, concurrent panel interpretations and institutional unification, and the evolution of the English duty-recognition methodology from Donoghue v. Stevenson to Robinson. The public artifact includes the JSON encodings, a browser viewer driven by a shared temporal-resolution engine, structural validation, and executable behavioral tests for fixtures, interval boundaries, input normalization, and equivalent timestamp representations.Expanded author version of a two-page demonstration paper accepted at the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2026). The ACM Version of Record, once published, should be cited by DOI.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Federal Senate (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.