On Pasinetti’s “separation theorem” applied to money

In his 2007 book Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians. A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to be Accomplished, Luigi Pasinetti advocates a “separation theorem” which distinguishes between the “natural” level of “pure theory” and the “institutional” level of the study of “actual economies”. He mentions money as an area of analysis where some aspects are to be dealt with at both levels. The aim of the paper is at discussing how this “separation theorem” may apply to money. It is shown that, in Pasinetti’s model of a monetary “pure labour production economy”: 1) The number of “degrees of freedom” is actually two, not three as claimed in the book – a point acknowledged by Pasinetti in private correspondence; 2) The deleted degree of freedom reflects the absence of the medium of exchange function of money; 3) This absence may be remedied by reinterpreting the two degrees of freedom in the terms offered by Ricardo’s theory of money; and 4) This interpretation preserves Pasinetti’s analysis of debt and credit relations as part of a “natural distribution of income” and gives a consistent basis to the application of the “separation theorem” to money. An additional import of the paper is that it draws on a hitherto unpublished private correspondence on this matter with Luigi Pasinetti in 2012.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2026.2720429
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Pasinetti’s “separation theorem” applied to money

Ghislain Deleplace
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Political Economy and Marxism
article

On Pasinetti’s “separation theorem” applied to money

Ghislain Deleplace
article en

Abstract

In his 2007 book Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians. A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to be Accomplished, Luigi Pasinetti advocates a “separation theorem” which distinguishes between the “natural” level of “pure theory” and the “institutional” level of the study of “actual economies”. He mentions money as an area of analysis where some aspects are to be dealt with at both levels. The aim of the paper is at discussing how this “separation theorem” may apply to money. It is shown that, in Pasinetti’s model of a monetary “pure labour production economy”: 1) The number of “degrees of freedom” is actually two, not three as claimed in the book – a point acknowledged by Pasinetti in private correspondence; 2) The deleted degree of freedom reflects the absence of the medium of exchange function of money; 3) This absence may be remedied by reinterpreting the two degrees of freedom in the terms offered by Ricardo’s theory of money; and 4) This interpretation preserves Pasinetti’s analysis of debt and credit relations as part of a “natural distribution of income” and gives a consistent basis to the application of the “separation theorem” to money. An additional import of the paper is that it draws on a hitherto unpublished private correspondence on this matter with Luigi Pasinetti in 2012.

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Université Paris 8 (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Pasinetti’s “separation theorem” applied to money — Ghislain Deleplace · European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS