Transfusion thresholds in apheresis: Results from a survey and focus group discussion

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusion are not tailored specifically for therapeutic apheresis patients. It is unclear how provider transfusion thresholds in the peri-therapeutic apheresis period correlate with guidelines. We hypothesized that individual apheresis clinician practice would not wholly adhere to transfusion guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A large, international survey was designed, beta tested, piloted and sent to all members of the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) Therapeutic Apheresis Subsection (n = 459). Responses of interest were used to generate discussion points for an open, expert-moderated focus group discussion at the 2024 AABB Annual Meeting. RESULTS: Total survey response rate was 10%, n = 47. Calculated sample size (survey responses) for 95% confidence level with a 10% margin of error was n = 80. Nonetheless, responses of interest were generated, including some responses deemed discordant with international guidelines. Five topics were discussed by the focus groups: (1) platelet transfusion thresholds, (2) transfusion methods prior to central venous catheter placement, (3) therapeutic plasma exchange platelet repletion, (4) hemoglobin transfusion threshold prior to RBC exchange, and (5) platelet transfusion threshold for initiating therapeutic plateletpheresis. CONCLUSION: The survey results and focus group discussion, framed within current international guidelines and the literature, highlighted the need for enhancing the value of apheresis providers' clinical judgment and ability to impact institutional policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70348
Primary Topic
Complement system in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfusion thresholds in apheresis: Results from a survey and focus group discussion

Kyle Annen, Sadhana Mangwana, Yvette C. Tanhehco, Wen Lu et al.
Transfusion
Complement system in diseases
article

Transfusion thresholds in apheresis: Results from a survey and focus group discussion

Kyle Annen, Sadhana Mangwana, Yvette C. Tanhehco, Wen Lu, Jensyn Cone Sullivan, Jennifer M. Jones, Louise Helander, Suzanne R. Thibodeaux, Walter E. Kelley, Gaurav K. Gupta, Monika Paroder, Yong Zhao, Jay S. Raval, Tanya Glatt, Nicole D. Zantek
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusion are not tailored specifically for therapeutic apheresis patients. It is unclear how provider transfusion thresholds in the peri-therapeutic apheresis period correlate with guidelines. We hypothesized that individual apheresis clinician practice would not wholly adhere to transfusion guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A large, international survey was designed, beta tested, piloted and sent to all members of the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) Therapeutic Apheresis Subsection (n = 459). Responses of interest were used to generate discussion points for an open, expert-moderated focus group discussion at the 2024 AABB Annual Meeting. RESULTS: Total survey response rate was 10%, n = 47. Calculated sample size (survey responses) for 95% confidence level with a 10% margin of error was n = 80. Nonetheless, responses of interest were generated, including some responses deemed discordant with international guidelines. Five topics were discussed by the focus groups: (1) platelet transfusion thresholds, (2) transfusion methods prior to central venous catheter placement, (3) therapeutic plasma exchange platelet repletion, (4) hemoglobin transfusion threshold prior to RBC exchange, and (5) platelet transfusion threshold for initiating therapeutic plateletpheresis. CONCLUSION: The survey results and focus group discussion, framed within current international guidelines and the literature, highlighted the need for enhancing the value of apheresis providers' clinical judgment and ability to impact institutional policies.

Transfusion
University of Vermont (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of Minnesota (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), South African National Blood Service (ZA), Memorial Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), Action Cancer (GB), MNGI Digestive Health (US), Takeda (United States) (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Complement system in diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.