The Use of Intravenous Clonidine in Postoperative Pain Management: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Clonidine, an alpha-2 receptor agonist, has been explored as a potential analgesic in postoperative pain management, but its efficacy and safety profile remain unclear. The aim of this scoping review was to present the evidence on the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE for studies investigating the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management, regardless of comparators or outcomes. Data were summarized and presented descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials, while the certainty of evidence was evaluated at the outcome level using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: We included 10 trials with a total of 646 patients. Most patients were ASA I-II and underwent major elective surgery. The trials varied in clonidine dosage, timing, and combination with other analgesics. All included trials reported outcome data for pain and/or supplemental analgesia with high variability in assessment strategies. The data showed inconsistent effects of clonidine in reducing pain scores and the need for supplemental analgesia. Reported adverse effects were also inconsistent across studies. The overall certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management is heterogeneous and limited, providing no consistent clinical benefit and underscoring the need for further research. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This scoping review presents the current evidence for intravenous clonidine for post-operative analgesia. So far there is not enough evidence to support a recommendation concerning if or how intravenous clonidine should be used in this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70329
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Intravenous Clonidine in Postoperative Pain Management: A Scoping Review

Johan Heiberg, Mette Krag, Bitten Dybdal, Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

The Use of Intravenous Clonidine in Postoperative Pain Management: A Scoping Review

Johan Heiberg, Mette Krag, Bitten Dybdal, Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya, Tórálvur Mohr
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clonidine, an alpha-2 receptor agonist, has been explored as a potential analgesic in postoperative pain management, but its efficacy and safety profile remain unclear. The aim of this scoping review was to present the evidence on the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE for studies investigating the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management, regardless of comparators or outcomes. Data were summarized and presented descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials, while the certainty of evidence was evaluated at the outcome level using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: We included 10 trials with a total of 646 patients. Most patients were ASA I-II and underwent major elective surgery. The trials varied in clonidine dosage, timing, and combination with other analgesics. All included trials reported outcome data for pain and/or supplemental analgesia with high variability in assessment strategies. The data showed inconsistent effects of clonidine in reducing pain scores and the need for supplemental analgesia. Reported adverse effects were also inconsistent across studies. The overall certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Evidence for the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management is heterogeneous and limited, providing no consistent clinical benefit and underscoring the need for further research. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This scoping review presents the current evidence for intravenous clonidine for post-operative analgesia. So far there is not enough evidence to support a recommendation concerning if or how intravenous clonidine should be used in this context.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Gentofte Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.