Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application

Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application is a two-paper research set proposing a lightweight, evidence-centered approach to preserving how archaeological knowledge develops and changes over time. Part I defines the core method. Rather than treating an artifact as a single claim, V2 treats the artifact as an anchor for multiple evidence-bearing components - including identity, chronology, archaeological context, provenance, attribution, function, condition, inscription, and interpretation - each of which may maintain its own evidentiary state while remaining connected to the professional determination, supporting evidence, responsible source, date, uncertainty, and prior history behind it. The model introduces determination history, selective professional escalation, bounded use of AI, and component-level GREEN, GREEN-YELLOW, YELLOW, RED, and STOP states designed to preserve revision without erasing earlier evidence-backed conclusions. Part II examines archive and repository application. It places the same core method within archaeology, museums, collections, archives, universities, and digital repositories, asking whether a thin review-logic layer can improve traceability, auditability, and responsible revision without replacing established expertise, institutional authority, catalogues, or collection-management systems. Drawing on existing cultural-heritage, archival, repository, interoperability, and digital-preservation practices, it proposes a constraint-first implementation and a measurable 10-25-record pilot. Together, the papers advance one falsifiable proposition: archaeological records may become easier to understand, maintain, and responsibly revise when evidence, professional determinations, uncertainty, and the history of change remain visibly connected. V2 is not presented as an authentication system or a claim of permanent historical truth; its value must be demonstrated through professional use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22119842
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application

Michael Grasa
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application

Michael Grasa
article en

Abstract

Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application is a two-paper research set proposing a lightweight, evidence-centered approach to preserving how archaeological knowledge develops and changes over time. Part I defines the core method. Rather than treating an artifact as a single claim, V2 treats the artifact as an anchor for multiple evidence-bearing components - including identity, chronology, archaeological context, provenance, attribution, function, condition, inscription, and interpretation - each of which may maintain its own evidentiary state while remaining connected to the professional determination, supporting evidence, responsible source, date, uncertainty, and prior history behind it. The model introduces determination history, selective professional escalation, bounded use of AI, and component-level GREEN, GREEN-YELLOW, YELLOW, RED, and STOP states designed to preserve revision without erasing earlier evidence-backed conclusions. Part II examines archive and repository application. It places the same core method within archaeology, museums, collections, archives, universities, and digital repositories, asking whether a thin review-logic layer can improve traceability, auditability, and responsible revision without replacing established expertise, institutional authority, catalogues, or collection-management systems. Drawing on existing cultural-heritage, archival, repository, interoperability, and digital-preservation practices, it proposes a constraint-first implementation and a measurable 10-25-record pilot. Together, the papers advance one falsifiable proposition: archaeological records may become easier to understand, maintain, and responsibly revise when evidence, professional determinations, uncertainty, and the history of change remain visibly connected. V2 is not presented as an authentication system or a claim of permanent historical truth; its value must be demonstrated through professional use.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
George Mason University (US)
George Mason University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modular Artifact Tool V2: Core Method and Archive-Repository Application — Michael Grasa · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS