From Traditional Remedy to Evidence-Based Phytotherapeutic Agent: Hedera helix L. in Respiratory Medicine

Hedera helix L. leaf extracts are regulated expectorants for productive cough, yet their evidence is dispersed across pharmaceutical quality, nonclinical pharmacology, disposition, toxicology, clinical pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and regulatory assessment. This review integrates those domains in a single study-level account and explicitly distinguishes isolated constituents, incompletely specified extracts, defined monograph preparations, proprietary extracts, and combination products. Hederacoside C is the pharmacopoeial marker, while α-hederin is the constituent most extensively examined in β2-adrenergic receptor models. Cell studies documented reduced agonist-induced receptor internalisation, greater ligand binding and cAMP responsiveness, and altered GRK2/β-arrestin signalling. Isolated tissue and animal studies reported antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory, antitussive, and tracheobronchial secretory effects. Rat studies showed low, matrix-dependent oral exposure to hederacoside C and α-hederin. Small exploratory human studies detected no or only trace α-hederin and did not permit conventional pharmacokinetic analysis. Clinical evidence includes placebo-controlled adult trials, active comparator studies, paediatric investigations, postmarketing cohorts, systematic reviews, and pharmacovigilance reports. Controlled adult trials of EA 575 reported greater short-term improvement in cough or Bronchitis Severity Score than placebo; paediatric efficacy evidence is dominated by observational studies and small airway function trials. Short-term tolerability was generally favourable, with gastrointestinal and hypersensitivity reactions as the principal recognised adverse effects. The European Union monograph recognises specified extracts for productive cough, contraindicates use below two years, and does not recommend use during pregnancy or lactation. The distinctive contribution of this review is the complete quality-to-clinic evidence map, including dose, model, endpoint, study design, extract identity, and unresolved evidence domain for each major dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172610
Primary Topic
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From Traditional Remedy to Evidence-Based Phytotherapeutic Agent: Hedera helix L. in Respiratory Medicine

Agata Pawłowska
Plants
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
article

From Traditional Remedy to Evidence-Based Phytotherapeutic Agent: Hedera helix L. in Respiratory Medicine

Agata Pawłowska
article en

Abstract

Hedera helix L. leaf extracts are regulated expectorants for productive cough, yet their evidence is dispersed across pharmaceutical quality, nonclinical pharmacology, disposition, toxicology, clinical pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and regulatory assessment. This review integrates those domains in a single study-level account and explicitly distinguishes isolated constituents, incompletely specified extracts, defined monograph preparations, proprietary extracts, and combination products. Hederacoside C is the pharmacopoeial marker, while α-hederin is the constituent most extensively examined in β2-adrenergic receptor models. Cell studies documented reduced agonist-induced receptor internalisation, greater ligand binding and cAMP responsiveness, and altered GRK2/β-arrestin signalling. Isolated tissue and animal studies reported antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory, antitussive, and tracheobronchial secretory effects. Rat studies showed low, matrix-dependent oral exposure to hederacoside C and α-hederin. Small exploratory human studies detected no or only trace α-hederin and did not permit conventional pharmacokinetic analysis. Clinical evidence includes placebo-controlled adult trials, active comparator studies, paediatric investigations, postmarketing cohorts, systematic reviews, and pharmacovigilance reports. Controlled adult trials of EA 575 reported greater short-term improvement in cough or Bronchitis Severity Score than placebo; paediatric efficacy evidence is dominated by observational studies and small airway function trials. Short-term tolerability was generally favourable, with gastrointestinal and hypersensitivity reactions as the principal recognised adverse effects. The European Union monograph recognises specified extracts for productive cough, contraindicates use below two years, and does not recommend use during pregnancy or lactation. The distinctive contribution of this review is the complete quality-to-clinic evidence map, including dose, model, endpoint, study design, extract identity, and unresolved evidence domain for each major dataset.

PlantsVol. 15(17)
University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.