Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify RNA–Protein Interactions

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential regulators of RNA metabolism and gene expression, influencing processes such as splicing, stability, localization, and translation. Despite their critical roles in health and disease, including cancer, identifying RNA–protein interactions remains challenging due to technical limitations and biases of existing methods. Here we review and compare experimental techniques—including in vitro affinity purification, in vivo crosslinking, and proximity labeling—and computational prediction tools for RBP identification. We assess their strengths, limitations, and applicability across biological contexts, emphasizing the benefits of integrating experimental and computational strategies. Our analysis provides practical guidelines for selecting appropriate methodologies tailored to different cell types and research goals. These insights aim to facilitate more accurate mapping of RNA–protein interactomes, thereby advancing understanding of RBP functions and supporting the development of novel therapeutic interventions targeting RNA–protein complexes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cells
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15171546
Primary Topic
Biotin and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify RNA–Protein Interactions

Brigette Romero, Vijay Parashar, Mona Batish, Victoria Beringer et al.
Cells
Biotin and Related Studies
article

Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify RNA–Protein Interactions

Brigette Romero, Vijay Parashar, Mona Batish, Victoria Beringer, Jadira Aurora Fuentes Bautista, Maryia Hrynashka
article en

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential regulators of RNA metabolism and gene expression, influencing processes such as splicing, stability, localization, and translation. Despite their critical roles in health and disease, including cancer, identifying RNA–protein interactions remains challenging due to technical limitations and biases of existing methods. Here we review and compare experimental techniques—including in vitro affinity purification, in vivo crosslinking, and proximity labeling—and computational prediction tools for RBP identification. We assess their strengths, limitations, and applicability across biological contexts, emphasizing the benefits of integrating experimental and computational strategies. Our analysis provides practical guidelines for selecting appropriate methodologies tailored to different cell types and research goals. These insights aim to facilitate more accurate mapping of RNA–protein interactomes, thereby advancing understanding of RBP functions and supporting the development of novel therapeutic interventions targeting RNA–protein complexes.

CellsVol. 15(17)
University of Delaware (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Biotin and Related Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify RNA–Protein Interactions — Brigette Romero, Vijay Parashar, et al. · Cells (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS