Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S

Global health has traditionally functioned as a project of high-income countries (HICs) addressing health challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This "outward facing" orientation has created conceptual and operational boundaries that obscure the persistence of health inequities within HICs and perpetuates the false assumption that resource-rich nations have resolved fundamental health equity challenges in their own countries. In this essay we argue that HICs have global health problems of their own and should be considered legitimate sites for global health intervention. We propose an approach to doing global health in the global north that is based on reciprocal learning and where solutions to global health problems can also be found outside the borders of HICs. Complementing the extant scholarship on the need to decolonize global health, this essay highlights LMIC-led successes that can inform global health practice in the U.S. and Canada thus positioning global health as a truly egalitarian project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007208
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S

Tsitsi B. Masvawure, Mary Ndu, Charity Oga-Omenka
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Health and Surgery
article

Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S

Tsitsi B. Masvawure, Mary Ndu, Charity Oga-Omenka
article en

Abstract

Global health has traditionally functioned as a project of high-income countries (HICs) addressing health challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This "outward facing" orientation has created conceptual and operational boundaries that obscure the persistence of health inequities within HICs and perpetuates the false assumption that resource-rich nations have resolved fundamental health equity challenges in their own countries. In this essay we argue that HICs have global health problems of their own and should be considered legitimate sites for global health intervention. We propose an approach to doing global health in the global north that is based on reciprocal learning and where solutions to global health problems can also be found outside the borders of HICs. Complementing the extant scholarship on the need to decolonize global health, this essay highlights LMIC-led successes that can inform global health practice in the U.S. and Canada thus positioning global health as a truly egalitarian project.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(8)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), University of Waterloo (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S — Tsitsi B. Masvawure, Mary Ndu, et al. · PLOS Global Public Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS