Disentangling public opinion on European integration: On the multidimensionality of integration attitudes

This study explores citizens’ attitudes towards European integration, moving beyond a simplistic ‘yes’ or ‘no’ perspective. Focusing on the EU–Swiss relationship, it examines a variety of integration questions using 2019 Swiss Election Study data. Latent profile analysis identifies five citizen groups that share similarities in support and opposition patterns regarding the studied questions: ‘pure sovereignists’, ‘neutrals’, ‘pure integrationists’, ‘cultural sovereignists’ and ‘economic integrationists’. The latter two groups are both comparatively more favourable of economic than cultural European integration, substantiating the claim that integration attitudes are multidimensional. Investigating the predictors of adherence to these two groups, the study finds education, income and party vote intentions to have a differentiated effect. Relevant group comparisons show that education and radical right vote intentions differentiate positions along the cultural, but not the economic, European integration dimension, whereas income, radical left and liberal vote intentions differentiate positions along the economic, but not the cultural, dimension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Union Politics
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165261479119
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling public opinion on European integration: On the multidimensionality of integration attitudes

Lukas Lauener
European Union Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Disentangling public opinion on European integration: On the multidimensionality of integration attitudes

Lukas Lauener
article en

Abstract

This study explores citizens’ attitudes towards European integration, moving beyond a simplistic ‘yes’ or ‘no’ perspective. Focusing on the EU–Swiss relationship, it examines a variety of integration questions using 2019 Swiss Election Study data. Latent profile analysis identifies five citizen groups that share similarities in support and opposition patterns regarding the studied questions: ‘pure sovereignists’, ‘neutrals’, ‘pure integrationists’, ‘cultural sovereignists’ and ‘economic integrationists’. The latter two groups are both comparatively more favourable of economic than cultural European integration, substantiating the claim that integration attitudes are multidimensional. Investigating the predictors of adherence to these two groups, the study finds education, income and party vote intentions to have a differentiated effect. Relevant group comparisons show that education and radical right vote intentions differentiate positions along the cultural, but not the economic, European integration dimension, whereas income, radical left and liberal vote intentions differentiate positions along the economic, but not the cultural, dimension.

European Union Politics
FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.