Driver proficiency assessment using multidimensional driving simulator data and machine learning

This study proposed a driver proficiency classification framework based on multi-modal behavioral data collected from a desktop driving simulator, including gaze behavior, operational behavior, and vehicle dynamics. Multi-modal features were aggregated at the segment and lap levels, and five machine learning models were evaluated under subject-wise validation to examine participant-independent driver proficiency classification. The primary nested cross-validation results showed that the overall classification performance varied across models and evaluation metrics under the current dataset. The chance-level tests further showed that only SVM significantly exceeded random classification in segment-level accuracy, with a mean value of 52.3%, while Transformer showed a marginally significant AUC tendency at the segment level, with a mean value of 61.7%, and a significant AUC result at the lap level, with a mean value of 69.4%. In contrast, recall and f1-score more frequently exceeded the chance level, especially for Transformer, which showed segment-level recall of 81.5% and f1-score of 64.1%, and lap-level recall of 86.4% and f1-score of 64.9%. Additional analyses further examined the classification results from multiple perspectives, including differences between intersection and straight segments, comparison with traditional assessment methods, feature differences by driver proficiency, and feature importance analysis. Overall, this study provides a data-driven method for simulator-based driving behavior analysis by integrating gaze behavior, control input, and vehicle dynamics with machine learning models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Reality
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-026-01469-1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Driver proficiency assessment using multidimensional driving simulator data and machine learning

Makio Ishihara, Jinwei Liang
Virtual Reality
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Driver proficiency assessment using multidimensional driving simulator data and machine learning

Makio Ishihara, Jinwei Liang
article en

Abstract

This study proposed a driver proficiency classification framework based on multi-modal behavioral data collected from a desktop driving simulator, including gaze behavior, operational behavior, and vehicle dynamics. Multi-modal features were aggregated at the segment and lap levels, and five machine learning models were evaluated under subject-wise validation to examine participant-independent driver proficiency classification. The primary nested cross-validation results showed that the overall classification performance varied across models and evaluation metrics under the current dataset. The chance-level tests further showed that only SVM significantly exceeded random classification in segment-level accuracy, with a mean value of 52.3%, while Transformer showed a marginally significant AUC tendency at the segment level, with a mean value of 61.7%, and a significant AUC result at the lap level, with a mean value of 69.4%. In contrast, recall and f1-score more frequently exceeded the chance level, especially for Transformer, which showed segment-level recall of 81.5% and f1-score of 64.1%, and lap-level recall of 86.4% and f1-score of 64.9%. Additional analyses further examined the classification results from multiple perspectives, including differences between intersection and straight segments, comparison with traditional assessment methods, feature differences by driver proficiency, and feature importance analysis. Overall, this study provides a data-driven method for simulator-based driving behavior analysis by integrating gaze behavior, control input, and vehicle dynamics with machine learning models.

Virtual Reality
Fukuoka Institute of Technology (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.