Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity score ≥5%: a post hoc, exploratory, long-term follow-up of RATIONALE-306☆

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, double-blind, phase III RATIONALE-306 trial, patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in the intent-to-treat population and in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score ≥5% subgroup experienced clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) benefit compared with placebo plus chemotherapy at the interim analysis and minimum 3-year follow-up. We report post hoc, exploratory, longer-term outcomes at study closeout with minimum 45.2-month follow-up in patients with PD-L1 TAP score ≥5% per European Medicines Agency recommendation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks plus investigator-chosen chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Of 649 randomly allocated patients, 55.2% had PD-L1 TAP score ≥5% (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 172; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 186). At 45.2-month minimum follow-up, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improved OS [median 19.1 versus 10.0 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.61] and PFS (median 8.2 versus 5.5 months; HR 0.50) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy. ORR was 71.5% versus 41.4%; median DoR was 7.1 versus 5.4 months, respectively. QoL was similar overall between arms, with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy trending toward better global health and pain reduction. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97.7% (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy) versus 98.4% (placebo plus chemotherapy) and grade ≥3 TRAEs in 70.2% versus 66.5%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased neutrophil count (35.1% versus 31.9%), anemia (13.5% versus 11.4%), and decreased white blood cell count (12.3% versus 17.8%). Treatment-emergent adverse events with ≥5% difference in incidence between arms at interim analysis decreased substantially after 12 months. CONCLUSION: First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy provided sustained and clinically meaningful efficacy benefits over placebo plus chemotherapy and was tolerable, with no new safety signals for patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic ESCC and PD-L1 TAP score ≥5%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108362
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity score ≥5%: a post hoc, exploratory, long-term follow-up of RATIONALE-306☆

David Tougeron, S.R. Park, Paula Jiménez‐Fonseca, Harry H. Yoon et al.
ESMO Open
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in patients with PD-L1 Tumor Area Positivity score ≥5%: a post hoc, exploratory, long-term follow-up of RATIONALE-306☆

David Tougeron, S.R. Park, Paula Jiménez‐Fonseca, Harry H. Yoon, Florian Lordick, T. Kojima, R. Hubner, S. Yan, Jingwen Shi, Ken Kato, Eric Van Cutsem, Jianming Xu, R. Pazo-Cid, X. Kong, E. Raymond, L. Wyrwicz, R. Ishihara, K. Wang, A. Avallone
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, double-blind, phase III RATIONALE-306 trial, patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in the intent-to-treat population and in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score ≥5% subgroup experienced clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) benefit compared with placebo plus chemotherapy at the interim analysis and minimum 3-year follow-up. We report post hoc, exploratory, longer-term outcomes at study closeout with minimum 45.2-month follow-up in patients with PD-L1 TAP score ≥5% per European Medicines Agency recommendation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks plus investigator-chosen chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Of 649 randomly allocated patients, 55.2% had PD-L1 TAP score ≥5% (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 172; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 186). At 45.2-month minimum follow-up, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improved OS [median 19.1 versus 10.0 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.61] and PFS (median 8.2 versus 5.5 months; HR 0.50) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy. ORR was 71.5% versus 41.4%; median DoR was 7.1 versus 5.4 months, respectively. QoL was similar overall between arms, with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy trending toward better global health and pain reduction. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97.7% (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy) versus 98.4% (placebo plus chemotherapy) and grade ≥3 TRAEs in 70.2% versus 66.5%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were decreased neutrophil count (35.1% versus 31.9%), anemia (13.5% versus 11.4%), and decreased white blood cell count (12.3% versus 17.8%). Treatment-emergent adverse events with ≥5% difference in incidence between arms at interim analysis decreased substantially after 12 months. CONCLUSION: First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy provided sustained and clinically meaningful efficacy benefits over placebo plus chemotherapy and was tolerable, with no new safety signals for patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic ESCC and PD-L1 TAP score ≥5%.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(9)
Ulsan College (KR), National Park Service (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Asan Medical Center (KR), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), University of Ulsan (KR), Biomarker Technologies (China) (CN), Beijing Enterprises (China) (CN), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet (ES), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Shanghai Clinical Research Center (CN), Leipzig University (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Falk Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Merck KGaA, BeiGene, Incyte, Astellas Pharma, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.