Agentic AI Security in Industry 5.0: Emerging Threats, Forensic Readiness, and Trustworthy Human–Agent Collaboration

Industry 5.0 places autonomous agents inside its human–agent collaborative loop, resting its human-centricity pillar on an assumption of trustworthy collaboration that has not been examined critically. Agentic artificial intelligence has moved from research demonstration to industrial deployment within months, introducing a threat class this setting has not yet addressed. This article bridges three literatures developed in isolation, Industry 5.0 cybersecurity, agentic AI security, and Industry 5.0’s own foundational scholarship, proposing a six-category threat taxonomy and a paired forensic readiness framework, formalised as a five-level maturity model and grounded in real 2024–2026 incidents rather than hypothetical scenarios. Both contributions are evaluated through two complementary methods. An exploratory elicitation exercise, modelled on Delphi methodology and using six independent large language models as blind panellists across two rounds, converges on a specific structural critique that is incorporated into the taxonomy’s final design. A retrospective coding exercise then applies that taxonomy to fourteen publicly documented incidents, finding that half require multi-category classification and that two categories remain unexercised in the current public record, evidence that physically embodied industrial deployment has outpaced the documented incident base rather than a gap in the taxonomy itself. This urgency is reinforced by emerging EU and UK regulation imposing 24- and 72-h incident reporting obligations that, on current evidence, most industrial organisations are not positioned to meet. The article closes with a research agenda addressing liability, evidentiary standards, and the readiness-sustainability trade-off.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17090826
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agentic AI Security in Industry 5.0: Emerging Threats, Forensic Readiness, and Trustworthy Human–Agent Collaboration

Maurice Dawson, Samson Quaye, Ahmed Ben Ayed
Information
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Agentic AI Security in Industry 5.0: Emerging Threats, Forensic Readiness, and Trustworthy Human–Agent Collaboration

Maurice Dawson, Samson Quaye, Ahmed Ben Ayed
article en

Abstract

Industry 5.0 places autonomous agents inside its human–agent collaborative loop, resting its human-centricity pillar on an assumption of trustworthy collaboration that has not been examined critically. Agentic artificial intelligence has moved from research demonstration to industrial deployment within months, introducing a threat class this setting has not yet addressed. This article bridges three literatures developed in isolation, Industry 5.0 cybersecurity, agentic AI security, and Industry 5.0’s own foundational scholarship, proposing a six-category threat taxonomy and a paired forensic readiness framework, formalised as a five-level maturity model and grounded in real 2024–2026 incidents rather than hypothetical scenarios. Both contributions are evaluated through two complementary methods. An exploratory elicitation exercise, modelled on Delphi methodology and using six independent large language models as blind panellists across two rounds, converges on a specific structural critique that is incorporated into the taxonomy’s final design. A retrospective coding exercise then applies that taxonomy to fourteen publicly documented incidents, finding that half require multi-category classification and that two categories remain unexercised in the current public record, evidence that physically embodied industrial deployment has outpaced the documented incident base rather than a gap in the taxonomy itself. This urgency is reinforced by emerging EU and UK regulation imposing 24- and 72-h incident reporting obligations that, on current evidence, most industrial organisations are not positioned to meet. The article closes with a research agenda addressing liability, evidentiary standards, and the readiness-sustainability trade-off.

InformationVol. 17(9)
Illinois Institute of Technology (US), Talladega College (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Agentic AI Security in Industry 5.0: Emerging Threats, Forensic Readiness, and Trustworthy Human–Agent Collaboration — Maurice Dawson, Samson Quaye, et al. · Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS