Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the survival benefit of mechanical left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients receiving peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of LV unloading (Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP]) on 60-day mortality in patients with refractory CS treated with VA-ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bi-center study including consecutive patients requiring VA-ECMO for ≥ 48 h in two high-volume ECMO centers between 2019 and 2023, using the target trial emulation framework. Patients were classified as receiving VA-ECMO alone or VA-ECMO with LV unloading if the unloading strategy was applied within 24 h after ECMO implantation. Propensity-score overlap weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences. The primary endpoint was 60-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ECMO weaning rates and device-related complications. RESULTS: Among 264 patients (76% male, mean age 53 ± 14 years), 138 (52.2%) received VA-ECMO alone and 126 (47.8%) underwent LV unloading (78 IABP, 48 Impella), 2 were lost to follow-up. Unloading was not associated with improved 60-day mortality (weighted risk difference: 1.4% [95% CI: -11.8%, 14.6%], p = 0.84). No significant differences were observed in ECMO weaning rates, but device-related complications were more frequent in the unloading group. CONCLUSION: In this propensity-score weighted analysis, LV unloading during VA-ECMO was not associated with improved survival at 60 days. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for a refined, phenotype-driven approach to patient selection for LV unloading in ECMO-supported cardiogenic shock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06213-4
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis

Ouriel Saura, Manuela Lucenteforte, David Hajage, Jonas Sundermeyer et al.
Critical Care
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Left ventricular unloading during VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: a target trial emulation multicenter analysis

Ouriel Saura, Manuela Lucenteforte, David Hajage, Jonas Sundermeyer, Stefan Kluge, Marvin Kriz, Angela Dettling, Benedikt Schrage, Lisa Dilange, Alexander Bernhardt, Charles Juvin, Alain Combes, David Levy, Benedikt N. Beer, Guillaume Lebreton, Pascal Leprince, Matthieu Schmidt, Guillaume Hekimian
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist regarding the survival benefit of mechanical left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients receiving peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of LV unloading (Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP]) on 60-day mortality in patients with refractory CS treated with VA-ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bi-center study including consecutive patients requiring VA-ECMO for ≥ 48 h in two high-volume ECMO centers between 2019 and 2023, using the target trial emulation framework. Patients were classified as receiving VA-ECMO alone or VA-ECMO with LV unloading if the unloading strategy was applied within 24 h after ECMO implantation. Propensity-score overlap weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences. The primary endpoint was 60-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ECMO weaning rates and device-related complications. RESULTS: Among 264 patients (76% male, mean age 53 ± 14 years), 138 (52.2%) received VA-ECMO alone and 126 (47.8%) underwent LV unloading (78 IABP, 48 Impella), 2 were lost to follow-up. Unloading was not associated with improved 60-day mortality (weighted risk difference: 1.4% [95% CI: -11.8%, 14.6%], p = 0.84). No significant differences were observed in ECMO weaning rates, but device-related complications were more frequent in the unloading group. CONCLUSION: In this propensity-score weighted analysis, LV unloading during VA-ECMO was not associated with improved survival at 60 days. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for a refined, phenotype-driven approach to patient selection for LV unloading in ECMO-supported cardiogenic shock.

Critical CareVol. 30(1)
Inserm (FR), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Milan (IT), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Institut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (FR), Fondation pour l’innovation en Cadiométabolisme et Nutrition (FR)
Pfizer, Sanofi, Fresenius Medical Care North America
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.