Pharmaceutical care in patients with gastric cancer treated with capecitabine: A randomized clinical trial

IntroductionCancer poses a major challenge to global health, impacting individuals, communities and societies worldwide. A significant proportion of global morbidity and mortality from neoplasms is accounted for by gastrointestinal tumors, due to their high incidence and lethality. Capecitabine, an oral antineoplastic agent, has brought advances in treatment, but requires caution regarding adherence and adverse events. In this context, it is believed that pharmaceutical care can significantly contribute to optimizing therapy and promoting better clinical outcomes.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the advantages of pharmaceutical care for patients with gastric cancer who are being treated with capecitabine.MethodsA multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study was conducted with patients with gastric cancer using capecitabine. Patients were randomised into two groups, namely control (pharmaceutical guidance) and intervention (pharmaceutical care). Sociodemographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected, and adverse events were identified, classified and analysed, with impacts such as dose suspension or reduction, emergencies, hospitalisations and use of additional drugs being considered. Quality of life was assessed before and after treatment.ResultsThirty-one patients were selected, 16 of whom were in the intervention group. This group completed more treatment cycles, although it had a higher number of adverse events, with less severity. All patients who received pharmaceutical care were adherent to their treatment. In contrast, patients who did not receive pharmaceutical care had more suspensions and dose reductions. They also had a significant worsening of overall functional capacity. In addition, their symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were aggravated. In the intervention group, however, there was an improvement in these symptoms.ConclusionThe study highlights the importance of pharmaceutical care in capecitabine treatment, especially in the management of adverse events, treatment adherence and promotion of quality of life. Despite the small sample size, the results reinforce the role of the pharmacist in the care of these patients and indicate the need for further studies with larger samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261481842
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmaceutical care in patients with gastric cancer treated with capecitabine: A randomized clinical trial

Jéssica Pronestino de Lima Moreira, Vanessa Cristiane da Silva Ferreira, Larissa dos Santos Sebould Marinho, Camille Nigri Cursino et al.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Pharmaceutical care in patients with gastric cancer treated with capecitabine: A randomized clinical trial

Jéssica Pronestino de Lima Moreira, Vanessa Cristiane da Silva Ferreira, Larissa dos Santos Sebould Marinho, Camille Nigri Cursino, Thaí­sa Amorim Nogueira, Sabrińa Calil-Eliás, Selma Rodrigues de Castilho, Ana Clara Duarte Dos Santos, Dulce Helena Nunes Couto, Ariela Dutra Norberto De Oliveira, Patrícia Kaiser Pedroso Cava, Larissa Rodrigues Nascimento
article en

Abstract

IntroductionCancer poses a major challenge to global health, impacting individuals, communities and societies worldwide. A significant proportion of global morbidity and mortality from neoplasms is accounted for by gastrointestinal tumors, due to their high incidence and lethality. Capecitabine, an oral antineoplastic agent, has brought advances in treatment, but requires caution regarding adherence and adverse events. In this context, it is believed that pharmaceutical care can significantly contribute to optimizing therapy and promoting better clinical outcomes.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the advantages of pharmaceutical care for patients with gastric cancer who are being treated with capecitabine.MethodsA multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study was conducted with patients with gastric cancer using capecitabine. Patients were randomised into two groups, namely control (pharmaceutical guidance) and intervention (pharmaceutical care). Sociodemographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected, and adverse events were identified, classified and analysed, with impacts such as dose suspension or reduction, emergencies, hospitalisations and use of additional drugs being considered. Quality of life was assessed before and after treatment.ResultsThirty-one patients were selected, 16 of whom were in the intervention group. This group completed more treatment cycles, although it had a higher number of adverse events, with less severity. All patients who received pharmaceutical care were adherent to their treatment. In contrast, patients who did not receive pharmaceutical care had more suspensions and dose reductions. They also had a significant worsening of overall functional capacity. In addition, their symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were aggravated. In the intervention group, however, there was an improvement in these symptoms.ConclusionThe study highlights the importance of pharmaceutical care in capecitabine treatment, especially in the management of adverse events, treatment adherence and promotion of quality of life. Despite the small sample size, the results reinforce the role of the pharmacist in the care of these patients and indicate the need for further studies with larger samples.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (BR), Instituto Nacional del Cáncer (CL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.