Wrongly estimated pretest probability can be harmful

By necessity, a wrongly estimated pretest probability leads to a wrongly estimated posttest probability, even for correctly interpreted quantitative diagnostic test results. The effect of wrongly estimated pretest probability on the clinical utility of quantitative test results is unknown. We simulated test results from one real and two imaginary, quantitative diagnostic tests to study this issue for specific values of benefit and cost of treatment. We found that a wrongly estimated pretest probability reduces the clinical utility of a correctly interpreted quantitative diagnostic test result and may, in extreme cases, cause harm to the patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2026.2724496
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wrongly estimated pretest probability can be harmful

Øyvind Skadberg, Arne Åsberg
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Wrongly estimated pretest probability can be harmful

Øyvind Skadberg, Arne Åsberg
article en

Abstract

By necessity, a wrongly estimated pretest probability leads to a wrongly estimated posttest probability, even for correctly interpreted quantitative diagnostic test results. The effect of wrongly estimated pretest probability on the clinical utility of quantitative test results is unknown. We simulated test results from one real and two imaginary, quantitative diagnostic tests to study this issue for specific values of benefit and cost of treatment. We found that a wrongly estimated pretest probability reduces the clinical utility of a correctly interpreted quantitative diagnostic test result and may, in extreme cases, cause harm to the patient.

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.