Exploring barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care: a qualitative study

Abstract Professional ethics is a cornerstone of quality midwifery care and is essential for safeguarding women’s rights, dignity, and well-being during childbirth. Intrapartum care settings are among the most ethically complex clinical environments, where midwifery students and practicing midwives frequently encounter challenges that may hinder ethical practice. Understanding these barriers is crucial for promoting ethical care and improving maternal health services. This study aimed to explore barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care from the perspectives of midwifery students and midwives. This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis approach. Participants were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation from hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Twenty-one participants, including 13 undergraduate midwifery students, 6 midwives, and two faculty members in midwifery and reproductive health, were recruited. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed according to the approach proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. Trustworthiness was established through credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Analysis of the interview data identified three overarching categories of barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care: organizational, behavioral, and individual–psychological barriers. Organizational barriers included physician-centered dominance, hierarchical power relationships, limited educational opportunities, and resource shortages, which constrained professional autonomy and ethical decision-making. Behavioral barriers encompassed inappropriate interpersonal interactions, excessive workload, and overcrowded clinical environments that undermined motivation and hindered ethical practice. Individual–psychological barriers involved moral conflict, ethical uncertainty, occupational stress, and fear of challenging unethical practices, often leading to moral distress and feelings of guilt. These barriers interacted dynamically, shaping participants’ experiences of ethical practice within intrapartum care settings. Professional ethics in intrapartum care is influenced by a complex interplay of organizational, behavioral, and individual–psychological factors. Addressing these barriers requires supportive organizational policies, equitable interprofessional relationships, strengthened ethics education, and the creation of clinical learning environments that foster ethical competence and professional autonomy among midwifery students and midwives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-69016-1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care: a qualitative study

Ghodratollah Momeni, Shahla Mohamadirizi, Mohsen Rezaei Aderyani, Soheila Mohamadirizi et al.
Scientific Reports
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Exploring barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care: a qualitative study

Ghodratollah Momeni, Shahla Mohamadirizi, Mohsen Rezaei Aderyani, Soheila Mohamadirizi, Razieh Pourkazemi, Afsaneh Ghomi Avili, Afsaneh Ghomi Avili
article en

Abstract

Abstract Professional ethics is a cornerstone of quality midwifery care and is essential for safeguarding women’s rights, dignity, and well-being during childbirth. Intrapartum care settings are among the most ethically complex clinical environments, where midwifery students and practicing midwives frequently encounter challenges that may hinder ethical practice. Understanding these barriers is crucial for promoting ethical care and improving maternal health services. This study aimed to explore barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care from the perspectives of midwifery students and midwives. This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis approach. Participants were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation from hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Twenty-one participants, including 13 undergraduate midwifery students, 6 midwives, and two faculty members in midwifery and reproductive health, were recruited. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed according to the approach proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. Trustworthiness was established through credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Analysis of the interview data identified three overarching categories of barriers to professional ethics in intrapartum care: organizational, behavioral, and individual–psychological barriers. Organizational barriers included physician-centered dominance, hierarchical power relationships, limited educational opportunities, and resource shortages, which constrained professional autonomy and ethical decision-making. Behavioral barriers encompassed inappropriate interpersonal interactions, excessive workload, and overcrowded clinical environments that undermined motivation and hindered ethical practice. Individual–psychological barriers involved moral conflict, ethical uncertainty, occupational stress, and fear of challenging unethical practices, often leading to moral distress and feelings of guilt. These barriers interacted dynamically, shaping participants’ experiences of ethical practice within intrapartum care settings. Professional ethics in intrapartum care is influenced by a complex interplay of organizational, behavioral, and individual–psychological factors. Addressing these barriers requires supportive organizational policies, equitable interprofessional relationships, strengthened ethics education, and the creation of clinical learning environments that foster ethical competence and professional autonomy among midwifery students and midwives.

Scientific Reports
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Islamic Azad University Semnan (IR), Qom University of Medical Science and Health Services (IR)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.