Terrorism, Hate Crimes, and Other Forms of Mass Violence: Examining How the Public Labels Violence Through a Conjoint Experiment

Despite extensive research on terrorism, hate crimes, and mass violence, less is known about how the public perceives incidents that overlap these categories. Many attacks exhibit features that could fit multiple labels, yet public labeling remains underexplored. This study uses a survey-embedded conjoint experiment with 1,181 US adults to examine objective and subjective factors shaping perceptions of violent attacks as terrorism, hate crimes, or mass violence. Participants evaluated hypothetical scenarios varying by weapon type, target, casualties, perpetrator characteristics, and motive. Findings provide insight into public perceptions and inform strategies for reporting and addressing hate crimes and violent extremism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2026.2720678
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Terrorism, Hate Crimes, and Other Forms of Mass Violence: Examining How the Public Labels Violence Through a Conjoint Experiment

Adam Kavon Ghazi-Tehrani, Erin M. Kearns
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Terrorism, Hate Crimes, and Other Forms of Mass Violence: Examining How the Public Labels Violence Through a Conjoint Experiment

Adam Kavon Ghazi-Tehrani, Erin M. Kearns
article en

Abstract

Despite extensive research on terrorism, hate crimes, and mass violence, less is known about how the public perceives incidents that overlap these categories. Many attacks exhibit features that could fit multiple labels, yet public labeling remains underexplored. This study uses a survey-embedded conjoint experiment with 1,181 US adults to examine objective and subjective factors shaping perceptions of violent attacks as terrorism, hate crimes, or mass violence. Participants evaluated hypothetical scenarios varying by weapon type, target, casualties, perpetrator characteristics, and motive. Findings provide insight into public perceptions and inform strategies for reporting and addressing hate crimes and violent extremism.

Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Institute of Criminology (SI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Terrorism, Hate Crimes, and Other Forms of Mass Violence: Examining How the Public Labels Violence Through a Conjoint Experiment — Adam Kavon Ghazi-Tehrani, Erin M. Kearns · Studies in Conflict and Terrorism (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS