Occlusion-Aware Visibility Coverage for Robotic Stop-and-Scan 3D LiDAR Mapping

Automated three-dimensional (3D) mapping with a survey-grade terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) is the canonical instance of robotic stop-and-scan light detection and ranging (LiDAR) mapping: the mobile platform must remain stationary for minutes per scan, so the environment must be covered with as few scans as possible. Where to stop hinges on a coverage model predicting what a scan pose will observe. The conventional isotropic-disk model counts every free cell within sensing range as covered—including cells behind walls—and, therefore, skips scans that genuine observation requires. We replace the disk with a ray-cast visibility region computed on the robot’s live two-dimensional (2D) occupancy map, admitting only cells in direct line of sight; define a line-of-sight (LOS) coverage metric over mapped free space and drive a marginal-gain scan/skip rule embedded in frontier exploration. The planner thus performs 2D scan-station placement for subsequent 3D mapping. In a controlled paired ablation in simulation, the visibility rule raises LOS coverage from about 77% to 84–85% for one to two additional scans, and it also outperforms a disk baseline governed by the identical marginal-gain rule, isolating the coverage model itself as the decisive factor. In a fully autonomous on-hardware comparison in an industrial test room, with each rule driving a mobile platform carrying a Leica BLK360 G1, the visibility rule raised LOS coverage from 77.6% to 92.1%; every visibility run’s scans registered offline at survey grade (4–5 mm bundle error, 84–88% overlap), whereas disk runs yielded at best a single-link network and once a single unregistrable scan. The results indicate that, for the room-scale indoor environments studied, occlusion-aware visibility is a sounder basis than Euclidean proximity for stop-and-scan placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175430
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occlusion-Aware Visibility Coverage for Robotic Stop-and-Scan 3D LiDAR Mapping

송용현, Tae‐Yong Kuc, Sangmin Kim, Byeongjun Kim
Sensors
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Occlusion-Aware Visibility Coverage for Robotic Stop-and-Scan 3D LiDAR Mapping

송용현, Tae‐Yong Kuc, Sangmin Kim, Byeongjun Kim
article en

Abstract

Automated three-dimensional (3D) mapping with a survey-grade terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) is the canonical instance of robotic stop-and-scan light detection and ranging (LiDAR) mapping: the mobile platform must remain stationary for minutes per scan, so the environment must be covered with as few scans as possible. Where to stop hinges on a coverage model predicting what a scan pose will observe. The conventional isotropic-disk model counts every free cell within sensing range as covered—including cells behind walls—and, therefore, skips scans that genuine observation requires. We replace the disk with a ray-cast visibility region computed on the robot’s live two-dimensional (2D) occupancy map, admitting only cells in direct line of sight; define a line-of-sight (LOS) coverage metric over mapped free space and drive a marginal-gain scan/skip rule embedded in frontier exploration. The planner thus performs 2D scan-station placement for subsequent 3D mapping. In a controlled paired ablation in simulation, the visibility rule raises LOS coverage from about 77% to 84–85% for one to two additional scans, and it also outperforms a disk baseline governed by the identical marginal-gain rule, isolating the coverage model itself as the decisive factor. In a fully autonomous on-hardware comparison in an industrial test room, with each rule driving a mobile platform carrying a Leica BLK360 G1, the visibility rule raised LOS coverage from 77.6% to 92.1%; every visibility run’s scans registered offline at survey grade (4–5 mm bundle error, 84–88% overlap), whereas disk runs yielded at best a single-link network and once a single unregistrable scan. The results indicate that, for the room-scale indoor environments studied, occlusion-aware visibility is a sounder basis than Euclidean proximity for stop-and-scan placement.

SensorsVol. 26(17)
Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Anyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.