Collaborative case formulation work in emotion focused therapy: a process microanalytic study

OBJECTIVES: To better understand how case formulations are developed in client-therapist interactions, we investigated examples to identify the implicit defining characteristics of CFW and therapist response modes (TRMs) present in them. METHOD: Using recordings of well-known EFT therapists, we extracted all examples of CFW by client and therapist, applying open-ended qualitative process-description to identify their implicit defining characteristics. This was followed by coding TRMs used. RESULTS: We found five defining features of collaborative CFW for therapist and client: reflective (vs. narrative), connective (vs. dealing with isolated elements), previously unspoken (vs. repeated), collaborative (vs. unilateral), and primary (vs. secondary to another activity). We also identified the TRMs present in CFW, the three most common being: empathic formulation, empathic conjecture, and empathic refocusing. CONCLUSION: In providing a research-based definition of CFW, we highlighted the breadth and collaborative nature of CFW. By highlighting the role of empathic conjecture and refocusing in CFW, we hope to more effectively guide therapeutic practice. Thus, this study illustrates a promising, new micro-analytic approach to studying types of therapist intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2721635
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative case formulation work in emotion focused therapy: a process microanalytic study

Susan Stephen, Robert Elliott, Iulia Ligia Manastireanu
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Collaborative case formulation work in emotion focused therapy: a process microanalytic study

Susan Stephen, Robert Elliott, Iulia Ligia Manastireanu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To better understand how case formulations are developed in client-therapist interactions, we investigated examples to identify the implicit defining characteristics of CFW and therapist response modes (TRMs) present in them. METHOD: Using recordings of well-known EFT therapists, we extracted all examples of CFW by client and therapist, applying open-ended qualitative process-description to identify their implicit defining characteristics. This was followed by coding TRMs used. RESULTS: We found five defining features of collaborative CFW for therapist and client: reflective (vs. narrative), connective (vs. dealing with isolated elements), previously unspoken (vs. repeated), collaborative (vs. unilateral), and primary (vs. secondary to another activity). We also identified the TRMs present in CFW, the three most common being: empathic formulation, empathic conjecture, and empathic refocusing. CONCLUSION: In providing a research-based definition of CFW, we highlighted the breadth and collaborative nature of CFW. By highlighting the role of empathic conjecture and refocusing in CFW, we hope to more effectively guide therapeutic practice. Thus, this study illustrates a promising, new micro-analytic approach to studying types of therapist intervention.

Psychotherapy Research
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.