Learning anatomy through multiple modalities: medical students’ learning experiences and outcomes

Anatomy education increasingly incorporates digital and simulation-based resources alongside cadaver-based instruction; however, uncertainty remains regarding how different modalities can be integrated to support both cognitive learning and emotional adaptation. This study compared the effects of prosection, plastic model-based practice, and Acland’s Video Atlas of Human Anatomy on medical students’ learning outcomes and experiences. A prospective crossover within-subjects design was conducted with 45 first-year medical students who sequentially experienced three instructional modalities across two anatomy topics. Following theoretical lectures, students participated in practical sessions using prosection, plastic models, and Acland’s Video Atlas. Pre- and post-tests assessed theoretical and practical knowledge. A feedback questionnaire including Likert-scale and open-ended questions evaluated students’ emotional responses, learning experiences, and instructional preferences. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. All groups demonstrated significant improvement between pre- and post-test scores ( p < 0.05), with no significant between-group differences in theoretical, practical, or total post-test scores. Tool-specific performance gains were observed in cadaver- and video-based assessment items. Qualitative analysis identified three main themes: self-development, learning strategies and method preferences, and evaluation of instructional modalities. Students described a gradual transition from anxiety and uncertainty toward familiarity, confidence, and engagement. They also emphasized the complementary roles of videos, plastic models, and cadaver-based learning. Comparable cognitive outcomes across modalities suggest that learning effectiveness depends more on pedagogical integration than on the instructional medium itself. Multimodal anatomy learning appears to support knowledge acquisition while fostering positive learning experiences, and authentic engagement with anatomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10050-y
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning anatomy through multiple modalities: medical students’ learning experiences and outcomes

Buse Naz Çandır, Zafer Ari, İlke Ali̇ Gürses, Zekiye Karaca Bozdağ
BMC Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Learning anatomy through multiple modalities: medical students’ learning experiences and outcomes

Buse Naz Çandır, Zafer Ari, İlke Ali̇ Gürses, Zekiye Karaca Bozdağ
article en

Abstract

Anatomy education increasingly incorporates digital and simulation-based resources alongside cadaver-based instruction; however, uncertainty remains regarding how different modalities can be integrated to support both cognitive learning and emotional adaptation. This study compared the effects of prosection, plastic model-based practice, and Acland’s Video Atlas of Human Anatomy on medical students’ learning outcomes and experiences. A prospective crossover within-subjects design was conducted with 45 first-year medical students who sequentially experienced three instructional modalities across two anatomy topics. Following theoretical lectures, students participated in practical sessions using prosection, plastic models, and Acland’s Video Atlas. Pre- and post-tests assessed theoretical and practical knowledge. A feedback questionnaire including Likert-scale and open-ended questions evaluated students’ emotional responses, learning experiences, and instructional preferences. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. All groups demonstrated significant improvement between pre- and post-test scores ( p < 0.05), with no significant between-group differences in theoretical, practical, or total post-test scores. Tool-specific performance gains were observed in cadaver- and video-based assessment items. Qualitative analysis identified three main themes: self-development, learning strategies and method preferences, and evaluation of instructional modalities. Students described a gradual transition from anxiety and uncertainty toward familiarity, confidence, and engagement. They also emphasized the complementary roles of videos, plastic models, and cadaver-based learning. Comparable cognitive outcomes across modalities suggest that learning effectiveness depends more on pedagogical integration than on the instructional medium itself. Multimodal anatomy learning appears to support knowledge acquisition while fostering positive learning experiences, and authentic engagement with anatomy.

BMC Medical Education
Koç University (TR), Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.