Trust in artificial intelligence for diagnosis of dermatologic lesions: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Artificial intelligence (AI) has considerable potential to supports dermatological diagnosis, but its adoption depends on understanding the perspectives of stakeholders. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence on the perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of AI among patients and healthcare professionals. We conducted a systematic search of major databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) from database inception through May 26, 2025. Data from ten included qualitative studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. The confidence in each finding was rigorously assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. The synthesis revealed three main themes: (1) the evolving role of AI across the dermatological diagnostic workflow; (2) significant barriers centred on clinical judgment, trust, and the physician-patient relationship; and (3) essential implementation requirements, such as usability and regulation. Confidence in these findings ranged from moderate to high. Successful AI integration requires transparent, validated, equitable, and usable tools. Stakeholders consistently emphasise that AI should be designed to complement, rather than replace, human clinical judgment and the physician-patient relationship to maintain a human-centred focus in medical practice. PROSPERO database (CRD420251010095)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03793-7
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in artificial intelligence for diagnosis of dermatologic lesions: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Julia Martínez‐Alfonso, María Eugenia Visier‐Alfonso, Vicente Martínez‐Vizcaíno, Shkelzen Cekrezi et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Trust in artificial intelligence for diagnosis of dermatologic lesions: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Julia Martínez‐Alfonso, María Eugenia Visier‐Alfonso, Vicente Martínez‐Vizcaíno, Shkelzen Cekrezi, Héctor Martínez-Martínez, Belén Sánchez-Rojo-Huertas, Andrea Turégano-Chumillas, Silvana Patiño-Cardona
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has considerable potential to supports dermatological diagnosis, but its adoption depends on understanding the perspectives of stakeholders. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence on the perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of AI among patients and healthcare professionals. We conducted a systematic search of major databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) from database inception through May 26, 2025. Data from ten included qualitative studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. The confidence in each finding was rigorously assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. The synthesis revealed three main themes: (1) the evolving role of AI across the dermatological diagnostic workflow; (2) significant barriers centred on clinical judgment, trust, and the physician-patient relationship; and (3) essential implementation requirements, such as usability and regulation. Confidence in these findings ranged from moderate to high. Successful AI integration requires transparent, validated, equitable, and usable tools. Stakeholders consistently emphasise that AI should be designed to complement, rather than replace, human clinical judgment and the physician-patient relationship to maintain a human-centred focus in medical practice. PROSPERO database (CRD420251010095)

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), Madrid Health Service (ES), Primary HealthCare (MT), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust in artificial intelligence for diagnosis of dermatologic lesions: a systematic review of qualitative studies — Julia Martínez‐Alfonso, María Eugenia Visier‐Alfonso, et al. · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS