Perioperative propranolol during robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, pilot trial (PeP‐RALP)

Abstract Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of administering perioperative propranolol, as an adjunct to reduce prostate cancer recurrence, in patients undergoing robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for European Association of Urology (EAU) intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer. Patients and methods Treatment‐naïve men aged 40–80 years with EAU intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer scheduled for RALP were enrolled in this single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 pilot trial. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive propranolol or placebo for approximately 3 weeks (about 1 week pre‐RALP and 2 weeks post‐RALP). Serial blood sampling was performed to measure catecholamine metabolites, serum propranolol and short‐interval prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. Participants self‐monitored pulse rate and blood pressure twice daily. Results Over 36 weeks in 2023, 160 patients underwent RALP; 111 were prescreened, 49 were fully screened and 40 were randomised, corresponding to inclusion rates of 36% among prescreened and 82% among fully screened patients. Pre‐RALP adherence was 98% in both arms; post‐RALP adherence was lower in the propranolol arm. No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 grade ≥3 adverse events were attributed to propranolol, and no surgeries were delayed. The epinephrine metabolite metanephrine increased intraoperatively in both arms and declined by the end of treatment. Mean preoperative PSA decreased more with propranolol than with placebo. As this pilot was not powered to detect between‐group differences, such differences are hypothesis‐generating only. Conclusions PeP‐RALP demonstrated that perioperative propranolol is operationally feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile within RALP workflows, with strong preoperative adherence. Our study supports a multicentre efficacy randomised controlled trial with standardised anaesthetic protocols, postoperative adherence support and oncological endpoints. All physiological and molecular results, including PSA dynamics, in this pilot are exploratory and solely intended to inform the design of any future trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJUI Compass
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70267
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative propranolol during robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, pilot trial (PeP‐RALP)

H. Ramberg, Bjørn Brennhovd, Alfonso Urbanucci, Fredrik Ottosson et al.
BJUI Compass
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

Perioperative propranolol during robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, pilot trial (PeP‐RALP)

H. Ramberg, Bjørn Brennhovd, Alfonso Urbanucci, Fredrik Ottosson, Viktor Berge, Anne Holck Storås, Helene Hartvedt Grytli, Shivanthe Sivanesan, Kristin Austlid Taskén, Suraj B. Thapa, Marthe Bjøre, Sandra R. Dahl, Thomas Kristiansen, Lars Bjerke, Per M. Thorsby
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of administering perioperative propranolol, as an adjunct to reduce prostate cancer recurrence, in patients undergoing robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for European Association of Urology (EAU) intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer. Patients and methods Treatment‐naïve men aged 40–80 years with EAU intermediate‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer scheduled for RALP were enrolled in this single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 pilot trial. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive propranolol or placebo for approximately 3 weeks (about 1 week pre‐RALP and 2 weeks post‐RALP). Serial blood sampling was performed to measure catecholamine metabolites, serum propranolol and short‐interval prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. Participants self‐monitored pulse rate and blood pressure twice daily. Results Over 36 weeks in 2023, 160 patients underwent RALP; 111 were prescreened, 49 were fully screened and 40 were randomised, corresponding to inclusion rates of 36% among prescreened and 82% among fully screened patients. Pre‐RALP adherence was 98% in both arms; post‐RALP adherence was lower in the propranolol arm. No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 grade ≥3 adverse events were attributed to propranolol, and no surgeries were delayed. The epinephrine metabolite metanephrine increased intraoperatively in both arms and declined by the end of treatment. Mean preoperative PSA decreased more with propranolol than with placebo. As this pilot was not powered to detect between‐group differences, such differences are hypothesis‐generating only. Conclusions PeP‐RALP demonstrated that perioperative propranolol is operationally feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile within RALP workflows, with strong preoperative adherence. Our study supports a multicentre efficacy randomised controlled trial with standardised anaesthetic protocols, postoperative adherence support and oncological endpoints. All physiological and molecular results, including PSA dynamics, in this pilot are exploratory and solely intended to inform the design of any future trials.

BJUI CompassVol. 7(9)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Norwegian Cancer Society (NO), Statkraft (Norway) (NO), Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (NO), Finnish Cancer Registry (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.