Process‐Based Model Parameters for Post‐Fire Snow Hydrology: Looking Beyond Snow Albedo and Vegetation

Abstract Wildfires fundamentally alter snow accumulation and melt dynamics by modifying forest canopy structure, snow albedo, and snowpack physical properties. Despite the growing body of work on fire impacts on snow, few studies have used physically based models to simulate post‐fire changes, and none have examined the global parameter sensitivities that govern these dynamics. In this study, we apply the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives in a high elevation Colorado watershed to identify and evaluate the model parameters that influence post‐fire snowpack evolution. We conduct a global sensitivity analysis, then sample sensitive parameters to identify behavioral parameter sets with respect to airborne LiDAR‐based snow depth in burned and unburned forests. Among behavioral parameter sets, we identify 4 parameters that differ significantly in burned versus unburned forests. These include the albedo decay rate (45% faster in burn than unburned forest), maximum canopy interception for rain (60% lower), minimum temperature for snow unloading (3.9°C warmer), and snow surface roughness (902% higher). Model simulations using behavioral parameter sets for burned and unburned conditions indicate 17% lower peak absolute cold content on average and 17% lower peak snow‐water equivalent (SWE) in burned conditions on average, with differences in depth, SWE, and cold content increasing throughout the snow season. These findings highlight the combined influence of canopy loss and accelerated albedo decay on snow energy balance and reveal additional post‐fire snow processes that are not typically represented in existing modeling frameworks. This study therefore provides a process‐level foundation for improving the simulated representation of post‐fire snow dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026wr043508
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process‐Based Model Parameters for Post‐Fire Snow Hydrology: Looking Beyond Snow Albedo and Vegetation

Adrienne M. Marshall, Andrew W. Wood, Arielle L. Koshkin
Water Resources Research
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Process‐Based Model Parameters for Post‐Fire Snow Hydrology: Looking Beyond Snow Albedo and Vegetation

Adrienne M. Marshall, Andrew W. Wood, Arielle L. Koshkin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildfires fundamentally alter snow accumulation and melt dynamics by modifying forest canopy structure, snow albedo, and snowpack physical properties. Despite the growing body of work on fire impacts on snow, few studies have used physically based models to simulate post‐fire changes, and none have examined the global parameter sensitivities that govern these dynamics. In this study, we apply the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives in a high elevation Colorado watershed to identify and evaluate the model parameters that influence post‐fire snowpack evolution. We conduct a global sensitivity analysis, then sample sensitive parameters to identify behavioral parameter sets with respect to airborne LiDAR‐based snow depth in burned and unburned forests. Among behavioral parameter sets, we identify 4 parameters that differ significantly in burned versus unburned forests. These include the albedo decay rate (45% faster in burn than unburned forest), maximum canopy interception for rain (60% lower), minimum temperature for snow unloading (3.9°C warmer), and snow surface roughness (902% higher). Model simulations using behavioral parameter sets for burned and unburned conditions indicate 17% lower peak absolute cold content on average and 17% lower peak snow‐water equivalent (SWE) in burned conditions on average, with differences in depth, SWE, and cold content increasing throughout the snow season. These findings highlight the combined influence of canopy loss and accelerated albedo decay on snow energy balance and reveal additional post‐fire snow processes that are not typically represented in existing modeling frameworks. This study therefore provides a process‐level foundation for improving the simulated representation of post‐fire snow dynamics.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 62(9)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US), Colorado School of Mines (US), Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Colorado School of Mines, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.