56 The evolving challenges and opportunities in adult brain tumour imaging: Insights from a review of United Kingdom neuro-oncology centres (2021-2024)

Abstract Introduction Brain tumour imaging is rapidly changing: while new technologies promise clinical advances, centres report growing staff shortages and burnout at a time of increasing demand. We examined how these trends have evolved since 2021 in United Kingdom (UK) neuro-oncology centres. Method Data were collected from 21 UK neuro-oncology centres (covering ∼84% of the population) in 2021 and 2024 via the Tessa Jowell Centre of Excellence for Adults programme. Anonymised data were analysed to identify trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) waiting and reporting times, neuroradiologist capacity, MRI equipment availability, and adoption of advanced techniques. Results MRI waiting and reporting times: Between 2021 and 2024, waiting times from request to report for brain tumour MRI increased across centres. Mean urgent outpatient scan turnaround time increased by 28% (12.7 to 16.3 days) and wait times for routine scans increased by 14% (43.9 to 49.8 days). Delayed reporting times drove this increase, with 18/21 centres (86%) citing challenges including workforce shortages (67%), rising demand, and equipment shortages (both 44%). Staffing and equipment Neuroradiology staffing varied widely (4–27 neuroradiologists per centre; median 11), as did equipment provision (3–20 MRI scanners per centre; median 7). Variation in imaging protocols Centres used an average of 31 different protocols at key imaging timepoints, indicating limited harmonisation. Innovation More centres reported use of advanced techniques, and over half (11/21, 52%) reported radiology involvement in neuro-oncology research. Conclusions Despite increased adoption of innovation, brain tumour imaging services face delays amid rising demand, workforce pressures, and equipment shortages. These results will inform efforts by the Tessa Jowell Brain Cancer Mission and partners to support sustainable investment, greater harmonisation of imaging practice, and ongoing national quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.050
Primary Topic
Applied Advanced Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

56 The evolving challenges and opportunities in adult brain tumour imaging: Insights from a review of United Kingdom neuro-oncology centres (2021-2024)

Nicky Huskens, Camille Goetz, Prof Adam Waldman, Samantha Mills et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Applied Advanced Technologies
article

56 The evolving challenges and opportunities in adult brain tumour imaging: Insights from a review of United Kingdom neuro-oncology centres (2021-2024)

Nicky Huskens, Camille Goetz, Prof Adam Waldman, Samantha Mills, Andrew Wright
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Brain tumour imaging is rapidly changing: while new technologies promise clinical advances, centres report growing staff shortages and burnout at a time of increasing demand. We examined how these trends have evolved since 2021 in United Kingdom (UK) neuro-oncology centres. Method Data were collected from 21 UK neuro-oncology centres (covering ∼84% of the population) in 2021 and 2024 via the Tessa Jowell Centre of Excellence for Adults programme. Anonymised data were analysed to identify trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) waiting and reporting times, neuroradiologist capacity, MRI equipment availability, and adoption of advanced techniques. Results MRI waiting and reporting times: Between 2021 and 2024, waiting times from request to report for brain tumour MRI increased across centres. Mean urgent outpatient scan turnaround time increased by 28% (12.7 to 16.3 days) and wait times for routine scans increased by 14% (43.9 to 49.8 days). Delayed reporting times drove this increase, with 18/21 centres (86%) citing challenges including workforce shortages (67%), rising demand, and equipment shortages (both 44%). Staffing and equipment Neuroradiology staffing varied widely (4–27 neuroradiologists per centre; median 11), as did equipment provision (3–20 MRI scanners per centre; median 7). Variation in imaging protocols Centres used an average of 31 different protocols at key imaging timepoints, indicating limited harmonisation. Innovation More centres reported use of advanced techniques, and over half (11/21, 52%) reported radiology involvement in neuro-oncology research. Conclusions Despite increased adoption of innovation, brain tumour imaging services face delays amid rising demand, workforce pressures, and equipment shortages. These results will inform efforts by the Tessa Jowell Brain Cancer Mission and partners to support sustainable investment, greater harmonisation of imaging practice, and ongoing national quality improvement.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Walton Centre (GB), London Cancer (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Applied Advanced Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.