The Commission’s 2025 intelligence cell proposal: from intelligence sharing to supranational intelligence?

This article examines what the European Commission’s 2025 proposal for an intelligence cell reveals about the trajectory and limits of EU intelligence cooperation. The proposal is situated within a longer genealogy of recurrent calls for a European FBI/CIA and is assessed through a paradigm shift framework. The findings suggest that the EU is undergoing a significant cognitive shift in how intelligence is framed: away from a narrow adjunct to foreign policy or counterterrorism towards a cross-sectoral instrument of preparedness, resilience, institutional self-protection and strategic autonomy, especially in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine and hybrid threats. This shift, however, has not been matched by positive feedback loops among EU member states and national services that shape actual intelligence cooperation. They still favour national ownership, originator control, bilateral and minilateral networks, and bounded EU-level fusion rather than supranational authority or control. Thus, while substantially increasing salience, the Commission’s policy entrepreneurship in the intelligence field remains contested. The likely trajectory is therefore not a supranational intelligence agency, but stronger SIAC/INTCEN-centred analysis, improved Commission access to threat assessments, and more structured but still sovereignty-sensitive intelligence support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Security
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2026.2718107
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Commission’s 2025 intelligence cell proposal: from intelligence sharing to supranational intelligence?

Oldřich Bureš
European Security
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
article

The Commission’s 2025 intelligence cell proposal: from intelligence sharing to supranational intelligence?

Oldřich Bureš
article en

Abstract

This article examines what the European Commission’s 2025 proposal for an intelligence cell reveals about the trajectory and limits of EU intelligence cooperation. The proposal is situated within a longer genealogy of recurrent calls for a European FBI/CIA and is assessed through a paradigm shift framework. The findings suggest that the EU is undergoing a significant cognitive shift in how intelligence is framed: away from a narrow adjunct to foreign policy or counterterrorism towards a cross-sectoral instrument of preparedness, resilience, institutional self-protection and strategic autonomy, especially in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine and hybrid threats. This shift, however, has not been matched by positive feedback loops among EU member states and national services that shape actual intelligence cooperation. They still favour national ownership, originator control, bilateral and minilateral networks, and bounded EU-level fusion rather than supranational authority or control. Thus, while substantially increasing salience, the Commission’s policy entrepreneurship in the intelligence field remains contested. The likely trajectory is therefore not a supranational intelligence agency, but stronger SIAC/INTCEN-centred analysis, improved Commission access to threat assessments, and more structured but still sovereignty-sensitive intelligence support.

European Security
Metropolitan University Prague (CZ), Center for Security Studies (GR)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.