A scale-free Higgs potential with discrete renormalization: kappa_lambda = 5/3 and m_H = 2v/sqrt(pi ln(1/alpha))

The LHC has established that the couplings of the 125 GeV boson follow the Standard-Model pattern at the 5–10% level, but the shape of the scalar potential — in particular the trilinear self-coupling — remains untested. We revisit the radiatively generated, scale-invariant potential V(φ) = Bφ4[ln(φ/v) − 1/4] (Coleman–Weinberg / Gildener–Weinberg form), whose shape fixes κλ = 5/3 and κ4 = 11/3 independently of normalization, and propose a new normalization principle to replace the loop sum that historically ruled this potential out (the top-quark loop makes the Standard-Model sum negative). Main results: If the effective theory's scales are generated multiplicatively in discrete steps of ratio α — so that the quartic running accrues in rungs of length ln(1/α) — and the per-rung increment is fixed by the two-channel braid structure of an elementary exchange (a unique Temperley–Lieb contact channel costing one closure loop, metered at the unit angular rate over the half-turn), then B = 1/[π ln(1/α)]. Consequently mH = 2v/√(π ln(1/α)) = 125.25 GeV, against the PDG world average 125.20 ± 0.11 GeV (+0.04%, 0.5σ) — equivalently the quartic coupling is the pure number λ = 2/[π ln(1/α)] = 0.12939 vs 0.12928 ± 0.00023. The internal alternatives are excluded by the data: the running coupling α(mZ) instead of the vacuum value (8.5σ), a Standard-Model loop contribution feeding the flow (51σ; even 10% contamination, 4.6σ), alternative angular measures (8–300σ). The look-elsewhere analysis is reported in full: a scan of 1134 simple closed forms yields three survivors, and the selection of 1/[π ln(1/α)] is structural (the 1/ln slot is forced by the discrete-rung hypothesis), not purely numerical. Falsifiable predictions: κλ = 5/3 (robust at the 0.3% level), with σ(HH) ≈ 0.55 σSM — on the destructive side of the triangle–box interference; testable at the HL-LHC, decisive at an FCC. κ4 = 11/3. Exactly SM-like tree couplings (κf = κV = 1) with vanishing invisible width. The sharpening of the mH world average tests the normalization linearly: a world average converging on 125.11 GeV would put the prediction at +1.3σ; below 125.0 GeV it fails. A French edition of the paper (higgs_selfcoupling_paper_FR) is included in the deposit. The analysis scripts (potential bench, normalization scan, angular-measure discriminant, Temperley–Lieb closure, discrete-flow tests) are included in the deposit and reproduce every number in the paper. The companion framework in which both hypotheses are motivated is documented separately (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21640710).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22127668
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

A scale-free Higgs potential with discrete renormalization: kappa_lambda = 5/3 and m_H = 2v/sqrt(pi ln(1/alpha))

Lilian Cariou
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
preprint

A scale-free Higgs potential with discrete renormalization: kappa_lambda = 5/3 and m_H = 2v/sqrt(pi ln(1/alpha))

Lilian Cariou
preprint en

Abstract

The LHC has established that the couplings of the 125 GeV boson follow the Standard-Model pattern at the 5–10% level, but the shape of the scalar potential — in particular the trilinear self-coupling — remains untested. We revisit the radiatively generated, scale-invariant potential V(φ) = Bφ4[ln(φ/v) − 1/4] (Coleman–Weinberg / Gildener–Weinberg form), whose shape fixes κλ = 5/3 and κ4 = 11/3 independently of normalization, and propose a new normalization principle to replace the loop sum that historically ruled this potential out (the top-quark loop makes the Standard-Model sum negative). Main results: If the effective theory's scales are generated multiplicatively in discrete steps of ratio α — so that the quartic running accrues in rungs of length ln(1/α) — and the per-rung increment is fixed by the two-channel braid structure of an elementary exchange (a unique Temperley–Lieb contact channel costing one closure loop, metered at the unit angular rate over the half-turn), then B = 1/[π ln(1/α)]. Consequently mH = 2v/√(π ln(1/α)) = 125.25 GeV, against the PDG world average 125.20 ± 0.11 GeV (+0.04%, 0.5σ) — equivalently the quartic coupling is the pure number λ = 2/[π ln(1/α)] = 0.12939 vs 0.12928 ± 0.00023. The internal alternatives are excluded by the data: the running coupling α(mZ) instead of the vacuum value (8.5σ), a Standard-Model loop contribution feeding the flow (51σ; even 10% contamination, 4.6σ), alternative angular measures (8–300σ). The look-elsewhere analysis is reported in full: a scan of 1134 simple closed forms yields three survivors, and the selection of 1/[π ln(1/α)] is structural (the 1/ln slot is forced by the discrete-rung hypothesis), not purely numerical. Falsifiable predictions: κλ = 5/3 (robust at the 0.3% level), with σ(HH) ≈ 0.55 σSM — on the destructive side of the triangle–box interference; testable at the HL-LHC, decisive at an FCC. κ4 = 11/3. Exactly SM-like tree couplings (κf = κV = 1) with vanishing invisible width. The sharpening of the mH world average tests the normalization linearly: a world average converging on 125.11 GeV would put the prediction at +1.3σ; below 125.0 GeV it fails. A French edition of the paper (higgs_selfcoupling_paper_FR) is included in the deposit. The analysis scripts (potential bench, normalization scan, angular-measure discriminant, Temperley–Lieb closure, discrete-flow tests) are included in the deposit and reproduce every number in the paper. The companion framework in which both hypotheses are motivated is documented separately (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21640710).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Systématique, adaptation, évolution (FR)
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.