Testing the Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis: A Pre-Registered, Multi-Stage Analysis of Mythological Motifs Consistent with Hominin Encounters

Title Testing the Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis: A Pre-Registered, Multi-Stage Analysis of Mythological Motifs Consistent with Hominin Encounters Description This study presents the first pre-registered, quantitative test of the "Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis," which posits that certain global mythological motifs may preserve fragmented cultural memories of interactions between Homo sapiens and archaic, non-sapiens hominin populations during the Late Pleistocene. A two-stage coding schema (v1.6.3) was applied to a corpus of 93 folklore entries (86 experimental, 7 primary control). Control populations were defined using a temporal/isolation framework, specifically targeting populations isolated from the primary Eurasian hominin overlap zone (~50,000–15,000 BP), with the San/Bushman corpus serving as the primary zero-signal control. Experimental entries scored significantly higher on the Hominin Likelihood Scale than controls (mean 2.80 vs. 1.14; Fisher’s exact p = 0.0139; Cohen’s d = 1.44). Crucially, the control group yielded the "Three Zeros": zero entries scored ≥3, zero displayed multiple consistent hominin-like traits, and zero carried any pre-registered pattern flag. To guard against post-hoc selection bias regarding the Australian corpus, an intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis reincorporated all Australian entries into the control group (N = 13). Under this combined model, statistical significance strengthened by two orders of magnitude (Fisher’s exact p = 0.00015; Cohen’s d = 1.45), with the control corpus maintaining zero entries ≥3. Stratified analysis by source credibility demonstrated that while high-credibility (A/B) sources drove the highest scores, low-credibility (C-rated) experimental entries still exhibited a significantly elevated score distribution relative to the all-C control (p < 0.0001), proving the signal is not merely an artifact of source quality or ethnographic attention. These results provide robust, pre-registered evidence that anatomically specific, non-stereotypical hominin motifs cluster in populations with documented Late Pleistocene overlap, and are systematically absent in deeply isolated control populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22134894
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Testing the Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis: A Pre-Registered, Multi-Stage Analysis of Mythological Motifs Consistent with Hominin Encounters

Jason Meade
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
preprint

Testing the Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis: A Pre-Registered, Multi-Stage Analysis of Mythological Motifs Consistent with Hominin Encounters

Jason Meade
preprint en

Abstract

Title Testing the Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis: A Pre-Registered, Multi-Stage Analysis of Mythological Motifs Consistent with Hominin Encounters Description This study presents the first pre-registered, quantitative test of the "Deep-Time Memory Hypothesis," which posits that certain global mythological motifs may preserve fragmented cultural memories of interactions between Homo sapiens and archaic, non-sapiens hominin populations during the Late Pleistocene. A two-stage coding schema (v1.6.3) was applied to a corpus of 93 folklore entries (86 experimental, 7 primary control). Control populations were defined using a temporal/isolation framework, specifically targeting populations isolated from the primary Eurasian hominin overlap zone (~50,000–15,000 BP), with the San/Bushman corpus serving as the primary zero-signal control. Experimental entries scored significantly higher on the Hominin Likelihood Scale than controls (mean 2.80 vs. 1.14; Fisher’s exact p = 0.0139; Cohen’s d = 1.44). Crucially, the control group yielded the "Three Zeros": zero entries scored ≥3, zero displayed multiple consistent hominin-like traits, and zero carried any pre-registered pattern flag. To guard against post-hoc selection bias regarding the Australian corpus, an intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis reincorporated all Australian entries into the control group (N = 13). Under this combined model, statistical significance strengthened by two orders of magnitude (Fisher’s exact p = 0.00015; Cohen’s d = 1.45), with the control corpus maintaining zero entries ≥3. Stratified analysis by source credibility demonstrated that while high-credibility (A/B) sources drove the highest scores, low-credibility (C-rated) experimental entries still exhibited a significantly elevated score distribution relative to the all-C control (p < 0.0001), proving the signal is not merely an artifact of source quality or ethnographic attention. These results provide robust, pre-registered evidence that anatomically specific, non-stereotypical hominin motifs cluster in populations with documented Late Pleistocene overlap, and are systematically absent in deeply isolated control populations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.