Visual function and symptom provocation in children and young adults with vestibular disorders: A prospective controlled study

PURPOSE: To understand if visual function tests with moving stimuli were harder to process and caused more symptom provocation in persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) patients compared with those with other vestibular diagnoses or without any vestibular symptoms. METHODS: 61 patients aged 8-23 years participated in a prospective study with three groups: PPPD (n = 21); at least one vestibular disorder without PPPD (n = 20); control-without vestibular or vision symptoms (n = 20). Subjects underwent visual function tests with moving stimuli: near point of convergence (NPC), amplitude of accommodation (AA), radial (r), and translational (t) motion coherence (MC). Somatic (headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) and eye symptom provocation (eyestrain, eye discomfort, pressure around the eyes) were assessed at baseline and after each visual function test using a Likert scale. Chi-squared tests compared rates of failure and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared measures between groups. Symptom provocation between groups and baseline versus postvisual function tests were compared using one-way ANCOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with PPPD (median 10.0 Diopters (D) IQR [8.8-11.6]) had the lowest mean AA measures relative to those with other vestibular disorders (median 13.3D IQR [10.4-15.8], p = 0.01) and controls (median 13.5D IQR [12.2-17.0], p < 0.001). Between groups, somatic symptom provocation of PPPD patients was significantly higher than those with other vestibular disorders and control groups at baseline and following each visual function test (p < 0.05). Only patients with PPPD demonstrated consistently elevated eye symptom provocation following each visual function test (NPC mean difference [MD] = 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-5.8, p < 0.001; AA MD = 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-5.3, p < 0.001; rMC MD = 5.0, 95% CI 3.2-6.8, p < 0.001; tMC MD = 5.3, 95% CI 3.3-7.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PPPD had significantly lower AA and considerably elevated eye symptom provocation at baseline and after visual function tests compared to those with other vestibular disorders and controls. These findings may improve understanding of the pathophysiology of PPPD and its effective diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optometry and Vision Science
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ovs2.70094
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual function and symptom provocation in children and young adults with vestibular disorders: A prospective controlled study

Sophia Marusic, Jacob R. Brodsky, Aparna Raghuram, Alice Yun et al.
Optometry and Vision Science
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Visual function and symptom provocation in children and young adults with vestibular disorders: A prospective controlled study

Sophia Marusic, Jacob R. Brodsky, Aparna Raghuram, Alice Yun, Neerali Vyas, Megan Herlihy, Carissa Wu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand if visual function tests with moving stimuli were harder to process and caused more symptom provocation in persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) patients compared with those with other vestibular diagnoses or without any vestibular symptoms. METHODS: 61 patients aged 8-23 years participated in a prospective study with three groups: PPPD (n = 21); at least one vestibular disorder without PPPD (n = 20); control-without vestibular or vision symptoms (n = 20). Subjects underwent visual function tests with moving stimuli: near point of convergence (NPC), amplitude of accommodation (AA), radial (r), and translational (t) motion coherence (MC). Somatic (headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) and eye symptom provocation (eyestrain, eye discomfort, pressure around the eyes) were assessed at baseline and after each visual function test using a Likert scale. Chi-squared tests compared rates of failure and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared measures between groups. Symptom provocation between groups and baseline versus postvisual function tests were compared using one-way ANCOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with PPPD (median 10.0 Diopters (D) IQR [8.8-11.6]) had the lowest mean AA measures relative to those with other vestibular disorders (median 13.3D IQR [10.4-15.8], p = 0.01) and controls (median 13.5D IQR [12.2-17.0], p < 0.001). Between groups, somatic symptom provocation of PPPD patients was significantly higher than those with other vestibular disorders and control groups at baseline and following each visual function test (p < 0.05). Only patients with PPPD demonstrated consistently elevated eye symptom provocation following each visual function test (NPC mean difference [MD] = 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-5.8, p < 0.001; AA MD = 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-5.3, p < 0.001; rMC MD = 5.0, 95% CI 3.2-6.8, p < 0.001; tMC MD = 5.3, 95% CI 3.3-7.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PPPD had significantly lower AA and considerably elevated eye symptom provocation at baseline and after visual function tests compared to those with other vestibular disorders and controls. These findings may improve understanding of the pathophysiology of PPPD and its effective diagnosis and treatment.

Optometry and Vision ScienceVol. 103(9)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.