There is no single oil market: a sourced EROI framework for middle-distillate (C12–C18) fuels

This note assembles a fully sourced, auditable EROI (energy return on investment) chain specifically for middle-distillate fuel — kerosene and diesel/gasoil, the ~C11–C20 boiling range — delivered to the point of use, and shows that the figure differs sharply, and for structural physical reasons, across both crude grade and consuming region. Two independent axes of differentiation are quantified from primary sources: (1) native middle-distillate yield by crude assay, which peaks in the medium-API-gravity band and falls at both the light and heavy extremes rather than scaling linearly with density; and (2) delivered energy return, built as extraction plus refining plus transport burden using a peer-reviewed refinery-efficiency regression (Elgowainy et al. 2014, 43 US refineries) and two independently published, self-consistent well-to-tank chains (JEC/Concawe for the EU crude supply mix; Cai et al. 2015 for Canadian oil-sands-to-US-Gulf-Coast pathways). Four supply chains are compared on a single, directly comparable basis: US domestic conventional crude (5.4:1), the EU's actual crude supply mix (3.8:1, a single self-consistent source), Canada-to-US diluted bitumen (2.85:1), and Canada-to-US pre-upgraded synthetic crude oil including the upgrading energy cost (2.0:1). The results show that the United States — simultaneously the world's largest light-crude producer and structurally dependent on imported heavy crude for its diesel pool — cannot substitute domestic shale output for the heavy sour barrels its Gulf Coast refining capacity was built to run; that pre-upgrading heavy crude before shipment is a net energy loss compared with shipping diluted bitumen to existing deep-conversion refining capacity; and that documented crude-grade splits (e.g. Iraq's Basrah export stream) are direct market evidence of ongoing field-quality decline. Every reported figure is provenance-tagged and traceable to a named, dated primary source; no term is filled with an unsourced estimate. The note explicitly distinguishes this delivered, middle-distillate-specific metric from broader societal or civilizational EROI — which includes natural gas, nuclear, and hydro and is outside its scope. This is a companion methodology note to EnergyIntellect (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21381857), the author's supply-side physical shock price-impact model for the global oil market.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22130359
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

There is no single oil market: a sourced EROI framework for middle-distillate (C12–C18) fuels

László Tatai
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
preprint

There is no single oil market: a sourced EROI framework for middle-distillate (C12–C18) fuels

László Tatai
preprint en

Abstract

This note assembles a fully sourced, auditable EROI (energy return on investment) chain specifically for middle-distillate fuel — kerosene and diesel/gasoil, the ~C11–C20 boiling range — delivered to the point of use, and shows that the figure differs sharply, and for structural physical reasons, across both crude grade and consuming region. Two independent axes of differentiation are quantified from primary sources: (1) native middle-distillate yield by crude assay, which peaks in the medium-API-gravity band and falls at both the light and heavy extremes rather than scaling linearly with density; and (2) delivered energy return, built as extraction plus refining plus transport burden using a peer-reviewed refinery-efficiency regression (Elgowainy et al. 2014, 43 US refineries) and two independently published, self-consistent well-to-tank chains (JEC/Concawe for the EU crude supply mix; Cai et al. 2015 for Canadian oil-sands-to-US-Gulf-Coast pathways). Four supply chains are compared on a single, directly comparable basis: US domestic conventional crude (5.4:1), the EU's actual crude supply mix (3.8:1, a single self-consistent source), Canada-to-US diluted bitumen (2.85:1), and Canada-to-US pre-upgraded synthetic crude oil including the upgrading energy cost (2.0:1). The results show that the United States — simultaneously the world's largest light-crude producer and structurally dependent on imported heavy crude for its diesel pool — cannot substitute domestic shale output for the heavy sour barrels its Gulf Coast refining capacity was built to run; that pre-upgrading heavy crude before shipment is a net energy loss compared with shipping diluted bitumen to existing deep-conversion refining capacity; and that documented crude-grade splits (e.g. Iraq's Basrah export stream) are direct market evidence of ongoing field-quality decline. Every reported figure is provenance-tagged and traceable to a named, dated primary source; no term is filled with an unsourced estimate. The note explicitly distinguishes this delivered, middle-distillate-specific metric from broader societal or civilizational EROI — which includes natural gas, nuclear, and hydro and is outside its scope. This is a companion methodology note to EnergyIntellect (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21381857), the author's supply-side physical shock price-impact model for the global oil market.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Affordable and clean energy
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.