Organoid Coculture Models for Cancer Research and Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT Three‐dimensional cancer organoids cultured in vitro closely recapitulate the phenotypic and genetic features of parental tumor tissues, making them powerful tools for cancer research, drug screening, and personalized medicine. However, traditional organoid cultures lack key components of the tumor microenvironment (TME), including cancer‐associated fibroblasts, immune cells, vascular networks, and dynamic physicochemical cues, such as fluid flow and oxygen gradients. These deficiencies limit the ability to study tumor–stroma crosstalk, model immunotherapy responses, and predict clinical drug efficacy, particularly for agents that function through intercellular interactions. To address these limitations, a range of organoid coculture strategies has been developed. Submerged Matrigel coculture enables the systematic reconstitution of specific TME components, facilitating the dissection of defined cell–cell interactions. Air–liquid interface culture uniquely preserves the native, unmanipulated TME, retaining resident immune cells, and fibroblasts for physiologically relevant studies of immune infiltration and checkpoint blockade. Microfluidic culture and organoid‐on‐a‐chip platforms introduce dynamic control over fluid flow, oxygen gradients, and shear stress, overcoming the static nature of traditional cultures and enabling vascularization, perfusion modeling, and high‐throughput drug screening. Three‐dimensional bioprinting offers unparalleled spatial precision in constructing multilayered heterogeneous tumor architectures, allowing for the recreation of complex TME structures such as vascular networks and tumor–stroma interfaces. This review synthesizes recent progress in these organoid coculture systems and their applications in immunotherapy optimization, adoptive cell therapy, and personalized medicine, while also analyzing the advantages and limitations of each model and offering perspectives on future developments toward more physiologically relevant preclinical platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Med Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdr2.70087
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Organoid Coculture Models for Cancer Research and Immunotherapy

Guobang Liu, Zhulan Chen, Wenzhi Tian, Huihui Yang et al.
Med Research
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Organoid Coculture Models for Cancer Research and Immunotherapy

Guobang Liu, Zhulan Chen, Wenzhi Tian, Huihui Yang, LI Guangxin, Xiaoling Liu, Zhuo Yang, Dong Chen, Meiyang Huang, Yongsheng Zhao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three‐dimensional cancer organoids cultured in vitro closely recapitulate the phenotypic and genetic features of parental tumor tissues, making them powerful tools for cancer research, drug screening, and personalized medicine. However, traditional organoid cultures lack key components of the tumor microenvironment (TME), including cancer‐associated fibroblasts, immune cells, vascular networks, and dynamic physicochemical cues, such as fluid flow and oxygen gradients. These deficiencies limit the ability to study tumor–stroma crosstalk, model immunotherapy responses, and predict clinical drug efficacy, particularly for agents that function through intercellular interactions. To address these limitations, a range of organoid coculture strategies has been developed. Submerged Matrigel coculture enables the systematic reconstitution of specific TME components, facilitating the dissection of defined cell–cell interactions. Air–liquid interface culture uniquely preserves the native, unmanipulated TME, retaining resident immune cells, and fibroblasts for physiologically relevant studies of immune infiltration and checkpoint blockade. Microfluidic culture and organoid‐on‐a‐chip platforms introduce dynamic control over fluid flow, oxygen gradients, and shear stress, overcoming the static nature of traditional cultures and enabling vascularization, perfusion modeling, and high‐throughput drug screening. Three‐dimensional bioprinting offers unparalleled spatial precision in constructing multilayered heterogeneous tumor architectures, allowing for the recreation of complex TME structures such as vascular networks and tumor–stroma interfaces. This review synthesizes recent progress in these organoid coculture systems and their applications in immunotherapy optimization, adoptive cell therapy, and personalized medicine, while also analyzing the advantages and limitations of each model and offering perspectives on future developments toward more physiologically relevant preclinical platforms.

Med Research
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Shenzhen University Health Science Center (CN), Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.