Antimicrobial prescribing quality for sexually transmitted infections: a scoping review

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) place a substantial burden on outpatient health care and are a key focus for antimicrobial stewardship due to rising antimicrobial resistance. Suboptimal treatment can result in ongoing transmission, reinfection and complications, such as pelvic inflammatory disease. Evaluating prescribing quality is essential to improve patient care and support stewardship efforts. This review synthesises evidence on antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs and identifies gaps to inform targeted interventions for this unique but critical setting. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review searched Ovid MEDLINE and Embase for English-language studies published from 2015 to May 2025 assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs in outpatient settings. Results were summarised descriptively; no formal critical appraisal was undertaken. Fifteen studies assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs in outpatient settings were included, predominantly from high-income countries, and focused on Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in analytic units, denominators and outcome definitions, limiting comparability across studies. Prescribing quality was primarily assessed against national guidelines, although approaches varied from antimicrobial choice alone to multi-criteria and all-or-nothing assessments, with inconsistent terminology used throughout. Reported guideline concordance varied widely, with generally higher concordance for chlamydia than gonorrhoea. Antimicrobial prescribing for STIs in outpatient settings is both understudied and highly variable. Despite increasing global policy emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship, there are no standardised frameworks to support routine auditing in this setting. Developing standardised auditing approaches would improve surveillance, support stewardship efforts and identify opportunities to optimise prescribing practices across a broader range of STIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Health
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/sh26138
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antimicrobial prescribing quality for sexually transmitted infections: a scoping review

Zohal Rashidzada, K. Thursky, Courtney Ierano, Xin Fang et al.
Sexual Health
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Antimicrobial prescribing quality for sexually transmitted infections: a scoping review

Zohal Rashidzada, K. Thursky, Courtney Ierano, Xin Fang, Jenna Maleki, Josephine Wen, Harlan Smith, Rodney James
article en

Abstract

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) place a substantial burden on outpatient health care and are a key focus for antimicrobial stewardship due to rising antimicrobial resistance. Suboptimal treatment can result in ongoing transmission, reinfection and complications, such as pelvic inflammatory disease. Evaluating prescribing quality is essential to improve patient care and support stewardship efforts. This review synthesises evidence on antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs and identifies gaps to inform targeted interventions for this unique but critical setting. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review searched Ovid MEDLINE and Embase for English-language studies published from 2015 to May 2025 assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs in outpatient settings. Results were summarised descriptively; no formal critical appraisal was undertaken. Fifteen studies assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality for STIs in outpatient settings were included, predominantly from high-income countries, and focused on Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in analytic units, denominators and outcome definitions, limiting comparability across studies. Prescribing quality was primarily assessed against national guidelines, although approaches varied from antimicrobial choice alone to multi-criteria and all-or-nothing assessments, with inconsistent terminology used throughout. Reported guideline concordance varied widely, with generally higher concordance for chlamydia than gonorrhoea. Antimicrobial prescribing for STIs in outpatient settings is both understudied and highly variable. Despite increasing global policy emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship, there are no standardised frameworks to support routine auditing in this setting. Developing standardised auditing approaches would improve surveillance, support stewardship efforts and identify opportunities to optimise prescribing practices across a broader range of STIs.

Sexual HealthVol. 23(5)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Austin Medical Research Foundation (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.