Communication as engaging community for social change: a multidisciplinary integrative literature review

Purpose This multidisciplinary integrative literature review explores communication as engaging community for social change, to generate new ways of thinking about a topic and stimulate directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach Two communication researchers draw on the work of Kent (2022) who emphasised the need to distinguish between using dialogue strategically by cultivating long-term relationships, over a tactical focus of generating transactional strategic dialogue for persuading or manipulating publics into organisational objectives. Our review process utilises a two-stage approach: (1) data collection (2) critical analysis and creative synthesis of findings that are discerned and evaluated according to a nuanced understanding of organisation public-engagement – where network structure and discourse are co-created by organisations and the communities that they engage (Yang and Taylor, 2021). Findings Inquiry reveals five major categories for understanding communication as engaging community for social change: Actioning; Change capability; Interrelating; Involvement Infrastructure; Becoming together. Further analysis shows while there was a growing awareness of actioning social media for dialogic engagement to foster social change, there is little evidence of this being embraced by practice. Emotion is the least visible category. Traditional organisational structures are not a good fit for complex contemporary change contexts which are demanding engagement with culture and interrelation factors, such as how the individual is relating to the collective. Originality/value Conclusions highlight how change participants can engage with new interpretations and understandings by carefully crafting spaces that cultivate feelings of closeness and bring belonging to living story experiences. Diverse 21st century social discourses offer innovative opportunities as dynamic supporting enterprises that make room for people to access sustainable conversations around what is being known as social progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-10-2025-0380
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication as engaging community for social change: a multidisciplinary integrative literature review

Jill Fenton Taylor, Victoria Erskine
Qualitative Research Journal
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Communication as engaging community for social change: a multidisciplinary integrative literature review

Jill Fenton Taylor, Victoria Erskine
article en

Abstract

Purpose This multidisciplinary integrative literature review explores communication as engaging community for social change, to generate new ways of thinking about a topic and stimulate directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach Two communication researchers draw on the work of Kent (2022) who emphasised the need to distinguish between using dialogue strategically by cultivating long-term relationships, over a tactical focus of generating transactional strategic dialogue for persuading or manipulating publics into organisational objectives. Our review process utilises a two-stage approach: (1) data collection (2) critical analysis and creative synthesis of findings that are discerned and evaluated according to a nuanced understanding of organisation public-engagement – where network structure and discourse are co-created by organisations and the communities that they engage (Yang and Taylor, 2021). Findings Inquiry reveals five major categories for understanding communication as engaging community for social change: Actioning; Change capability; Interrelating; Involvement Infrastructure; Becoming together. Further analysis shows while there was a growing awareness of actioning social media for dialogic engagement to foster social change, there is little evidence of this being embraced by practice. Emotion is the least visible category. Traditional organisational structures are not a good fit for complex contemporary change contexts which are demanding engagement with culture and interrelation factors, such as how the individual is relating to the collective. Originality/value Conclusions highlight how change participants can engage with new interpretations and understandings by carefully crafting spaces that cultivate feelings of closeness and bring belonging to living story experiences. Diverse 21st century social discourses offer innovative opportunities as dynamic supporting enterprises that make room for people to access sustainable conversations around what is being known as social progress.

Qualitative Research Journal
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Charles Sturt University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.