Return and readmission policy in Europe: Development, implementation, impact and controversies

This introductory article presents the aims, context, and main findings of a symposium on return and readmission policies in Europe. It situates contemporary return policy within the historical transformation of European migration governance, from postwar labor recruitment and refugee protection to the politicization, securitization, and administrative intensification of removal. Drawing on eight national case studies covering seven EU member states and the United Kingdom, the article examines how return and readmission have become central organizing principles of migration governance. It identifies common patterns across the cases, including deterrence, detention, externalization, accelerated procedures, expanded discretion, weakened safeguards, and the production of deportability and legal limbo. The article argues that these developments reveal not merely technical changes in migration administration, but increasingly visible authoritarian tendencies within European return governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261481979
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Return and readmission policy in Europe: Development, implementation, impact and controversies

Aida Ibričević, Zoran Slavnić, Branka Likić‐Brborić
Critical Sociology
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Return and readmission policy in Europe: Development, implementation, impact and controversies

Aida Ibričević, Zoran Slavnić, Branka Likić‐Brborić
article en

Abstract

This introductory article presents the aims, context, and main findings of a symposium on return and readmission policies in Europe. It situates contemporary return policy within the historical transformation of European migration governance, from postwar labor recruitment and refugee protection to the politicization, securitization, and administrative intensification of removal. Drawing on eight national case studies covering seven EU member states and the United Kingdom, the article examines how return and readmission have become central organizing principles of migration governance. It identifies common patterns across the cases, including deterrence, detention, externalization, accelerated procedures, expanded discretion, weakened safeguards, and the production of deportability and legal limbo. The article argues that these developments reveal not merely technical changes in migration administration, but increasingly visible authoritarian tendencies within European return governance.

Critical Sociology
Linköping University (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.