Retirement, Economic Vulnerability, and Subjective Wellbeing: A 13-Year Panel Study from the UK

Abstract Retirement constitutes a major life transition with significant implications for wellbeing, yet whether economically vulnerable individuals benefit equally remains underexplored. Drawing on continuity theory, activity theory, and the job demands-resources (JDR) framework, this study develops competing predictions about how economic vulnerability shapes the relationship between retirement and wellbeing. We examine the relationship between retirement and subjective wellbeing among UK adults aged 50–75, and investigate whether low income, lack of pension coverage, and poor health alter these associations. We analyse 13 waves (2009–2022) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, comprising 26,118 individuals and 180,848 person-years of observation. Fixed-effects regression models are employed to isolate within-person changes across the retirement transition. Results indicate that retirement is significantly associated with improved life satisfaction and reduced psychological distress. Contrary to continuity and activity theory, economic vulnerability did not weaken these beneficial effects. Low-income individuals experienced significantly greater improvements in both outcomes compared to their higher-income counterparts. Those without private pension coverage and those in poor health also demonstrated equal or larger wellbeing gains upon retirement. This is consistent with the JDR framework, which predicts that disadvantaged workers benefit most from exiting high-strain, low-reward employment. Robustness checks, including an absorbing-state retirement definition and the exclusion of COVID-19 pandemic waves, confirmed these patterns. This suggests that retirement may reduce wellbeing inequality, even though the vulnerable start at lower levels and differences persist after retirement. While timing is not explored, the economically vulnerable reap significant gains from retirement, and wellbeing should be part of discussions about longer working lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work Aging and Retirement
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waag013
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retirement, Economic Vulnerability, and Subjective Wellbeing: A 13-Year Panel Study from the UK

Seth Acquah Boateng, Alexander Opoku, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Jie Liu
Work Aging and Retirement
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Retirement, Economic Vulnerability, and Subjective Wellbeing: A 13-Year Panel Study from the UK

Seth Acquah Boateng, Alexander Opoku, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Jie Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Retirement constitutes a major life transition with significant implications for wellbeing, yet whether economically vulnerable individuals benefit equally remains underexplored. Drawing on continuity theory, activity theory, and the job demands-resources (JDR) framework, this study develops competing predictions about how economic vulnerability shapes the relationship between retirement and wellbeing. We examine the relationship between retirement and subjective wellbeing among UK adults aged 50–75, and investigate whether low income, lack of pension coverage, and poor health alter these associations. We analyse 13 waves (2009–2022) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, comprising 26,118 individuals and 180,848 person-years of observation. Fixed-effects regression models are employed to isolate within-person changes across the retirement transition. Results indicate that retirement is significantly associated with improved life satisfaction and reduced psychological distress. Contrary to continuity and activity theory, economic vulnerability did not weaken these beneficial effects. Low-income individuals experienced significantly greater improvements in both outcomes compared to their higher-income counterparts. Those without private pension coverage and those in poor health also demonstrated equal or larger wellbeing gains upon retirement. This is consistent with the JDR framework, which predicts that disadvantaged workers benefit most from exiting high-strain, low-reward employment. Robustness checks, including an absorbing-state retirement definition and the exclusion of COVID-19 pandemic waves, confirmed these patterns. This suggests that retirement may reduce wellbeing inequality, even though the vulnerable start at lower levels and differences persist after retirement. While timing is not explored, the economically vulnerable reap significant gains from retirement, and wellbeing should be part of discussions about longer working lives.

Work Aging and Retirement
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Northwestern Polytechnic University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.